Article Search Results (114)
Articles on eminent domain
Articles on eminent domain
Sponsored Results
 | City's Rent Control Ordinance Constitutes a Regulatory Taking of Property from Mobile Home Park Owners Mona Ebrahimi, Jon E. Goetz; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, [incorporation phrase format]A Law Corporation; October 26, 2009, previously published on October 15, 2009 In Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, (--- F.3d ---, C.A.9 (Cal.), September 28, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether a city's mobile home rent control ordinance constitutes a regulatory taking of property from mobile home park owners. The Court of Appeals... |
| The Lack of a Written Lease Is Not Fatal to a Business Owner's Quest for Compensation for Loss of Goodwill in an Eminent Domain Proceeding Diana D. Halpenny, Karina K. Terakura, Amara Harrell, Mona Ebrahimi, William T. Chisum; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, [incorporation phrase format]A Law Corporation; July 20, 2009, previously published on July 7, 2009 In Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 2 Dist., June 23, 2009), a California Court of Appeal issued an opinion clarifying when a public entity must compensate a business for loss of goodwill in an eminent domain action. |
| Maryland's Bad Track Record Gideon Kanner; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP; June 2, 2009, previously published on May 7, 2009 No sooner did the ink dry on my celebration of the 25th anniversary of the erstwhile Baltimore Colts' midnight departure to Indianapolis, when Maryland has provided us with more eminent domain related stuff for our gristmill. |
| City's Resolution adopted for the Condemnation of Property Did Not Sufficiently Specify the Public Purpose of the Condemnation as Required by Eminent Domain Law William T. Chisum, Mona Ebrahimi, Amara Harrell, Karina K. Terakura; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, [incorporation phrase format]A Law Corporation; April 1, 2009, previously published on March 6, 2009 In City of Stockton v. Marina Towers LLC, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ---, Cal.App. 3 Dist., Feb. 13, 2009), a California Court of Appeal rejected a city's attempt to "condemn first [and] decide what to do with the property later." |
 | Eminent Domain and 2009 Texas Legislature Casey T. Wallace, Sandy D. Hellums, Mike Stafford; Haynes and Boone, LLP; March 5, 2009, previously published on February 9, 2009 Sparked by challenges like the Supreme Court's landmark Kelo decision and public outcry against projects like the now-defunct Trans-Texas Corridor, the 2009 Texas Legislature is debating issues surrounding eminent domain. |
| In Eminent Domain Proceedings, California Courts Do Not Consider the Potential Future Development of a Property in Determining Its Fair and Actual Value Karina K. Terakura, Patrick L. Enright; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, [incorporation phrase format]A Law Corporation; January 28, 2009, previously published on December 29, 2008 In City and County of San Francisco v. Coyne, (--- Cal.Rptr. 3d ---, Cal.App. 1 Dist., December 5, 2008), a California Court of Appeal considered a dispute over the value of a property acquired by a city in an eminent domain proceeding, in which the prior owners of the property contended they were... |
| Delaware Governor Vetoes Bill Restricting Use of Eminent Domain Drew K. Kapur, George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; May 22, 2009, previously published on July 2, 2008 On June 28, 2008, Gov. Ruth Ann Minner of Delaware vetoed a bill that would have placed tougher restrictions on governmental entities seeking to take private property by eminent domain. |
| Missouri Supreme Court Grants Shopping Center Owner Right to Sue City for Damages Caused by Threat of Condemnation, But... George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; May 12, 2009, previously published on June 13, 2008 Property owners in Missouri need not wait until their property is condemned to seek precondemnation damages, at least according to the Missouri Supreme Court. |
| California Voters Pass Eminent Domain Reform: Impact Limited George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; April 25, 2009, previously published on June 5, 2008 On June 3, 2008, California voters convincingly approved Proposition 99 and at the same time rejected Proposition 98. |
| Counsel to Counsel Magazine -- May 2008 Complete Issue April 29, 2008 President's Letter: These are difficult times for many companies, but such times usually call the legal function to the fore. It's clear that the current economic slowdown has put real strain on corporations. The cash crunch has tightened business lending and made restructuring a more... |
