 Article
Feeds
|
Plaintiffs Still Must Show that a Policy with Discriminatory Effect was Actually Motivated by Age |
August 7, 2008
Previously published on July 2008
In another disparate impact case, the Supreme Court held that the Commonwealth of Kentucky's disability plan did not discriminate based on age even though workers who became disabled after becoming eligible for retirement based on age did not receive the same benefits as some workers who became disabled prior to being eligible for retirement.
|
The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
|
|
RSS | Blogs | Site Map | Contact Us