Lexis Nexis
 |    |  
Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services

Home > Search Legal Topics > Article Abstract



Martindale-Hubbell Article RSS Feeds Article Feeds

Forfeiture for Competition Clauses in ERISA Top-Hat Plans: How Can They Be Enforced?


by Daniel J. Anders
Larry R. Wood
Daniel J. Boland
Pepper Hamilton LLP View Firm Credentials
Philadelphia Office

September 18, 2004

Previously published on November 12, 2003

Many executive-level benefits and compensation agreements (top-hat plans) contain provisions requiring forfeiture of benefits if the executive, upon retirement, competes with the former employer. These non-competition provisions are commonly called "forfeiture for competition" clauses.

But as many employers have found when disputes arise, enforcement of these provisions can be difficult. Differences in state law regarding the enforceability of non-competition clauses in the employment context, and a general trend toward interpreting restrictive covenants narrowly in favor of the former employee, can frustrate employer attempts to enforce forfeiture for competition clauses.




 

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.




Total Practice Solutions

 
Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.