Major New ESA Decision Limits Mitigation the Services May Require

by Robert J. Uram View Biography
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP View Firm Credentials
San Francisco Office

More...

June 10, 2005

Previously published on July 2004

In Westlands Water District v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, filed July 14th, 2004, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court ruling that set aside two conditions included in non-jeopardy biological opinions as non-discretionary "reasonable and prudent measures."

Start New Search

View the full text of this article

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Search Legal Topics

Major New ESA Decision Limits Mitigation the Services May Require

More...