Home > Legal Library > Article

Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected

Franchisors Must Repurchase Damaged Equipment From Franchisees Upon Rescission

Brooke MacKenzie
Adam Ship
McCarthy Tétrault LLP - Toronto Office

February 17, 2014

Previously published on February 4, 2014

In the latest installment of the Springdale Pizza Depot franchise dispute, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice clarified that, upon rescission, franchisors must buy back supplies and equipment purchased by the franchisee pursuant to the franchise agreement - even if the equipment is in very poor condition.

In 2189205 Ontario Inc. v. Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd., 2014 ONSC 530, Master Muir applied his earlier express finding in the Springdale action that section 6(6) of the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, SO 2000, C.3 makes it mandatory for franchisors to repurchase equipment at a price equal to the purchase price paid by the franchisee. Although the Springdale defendants argued that the improper removal and storage of the equipment in a barn for several years made it so the plaintiff franchisees were “unable” to return the supplies, Master Muir held that there was no duty on a franchisee to mitigate, and that under the remedial scheme of the Act the franchisee is entitled to be made whole.

Franchisors should be mindful of this decision to understand their mandatory obligations when facing rescission for late or inadequate disclosure.


The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

View More Library Documents By...

McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Toronto Office
Toronto Office
Practice Area
McCarthy Tétrault LLP Overview