Lexis Nexis
 |    |  
Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services

Home > Search Legal Topics > Article Abstract



Martindale-Hubbell Article RSS Feeds Article Feeds

Supreme Court Rules That Public Employee's Performance of Job Duties Alone Is Not Protected Speech Under the First Amendment


by Daniel P. Westman View Biography
Morrison & Foerster LLP View Firm Credentials
McLean Office

April 1, 2007

Previously published on May 30, 2006

In today's 5 to 4 opinion in Garcetti v. Ceballos (No. 04-473) authored by Justice Kennedy and joined by Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, the Supreme Court held that government employees who "make statements pursuant to their official duties" do not engage in speech protected under the First Amendment. The ruling involves a government lawyer's claim for protection from retaliation under the First Amendment, but also has significant implications for the private sector, which is subject to many state and federal statutes that protect private sector employees from retaliation.




 

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.




Total Practice Solutions

 
Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.