martindale.com
Legal Library
|
The Innocent Insured: Intent vs. Negligence |
May 30, 2012
Previously published on May 2012
On April 27, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Durham District School Board v. Grodesky, on review from the Ontario Superior Court. The panel overturned the lower Court’s decision and ruled that ING Insurance Company of Canada (“ING”) could not rely on an Intentional/Criminal Acts exclusion to deny its policyholder, Todd James (“James”), a defence.
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
| | View More Library Documents By... | | | | |
| | | | Blaney McMurtry LLP Overview |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|