Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (6849)

  
Documents on insurance
 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLNew Jersey Appellate Division Makes Clear That Proper Practice Requires Severing Bad Faith Claim From Uninsured Motorist Claim, And Staying Discovery Of The Bad Faith Claim Until The Underlying Claim Is Determined (New Jersey Appellate Division)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published on March 26, 2015
In Wacker-Ciocco v. GEICO, the court addressed the applicability of its earlier decision in Procopio v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 433 N.J. Super. 377, 80 A.3d 749 (App. Div. 2013), on the issue of discovery and severance of bad faith claims. In the earlier case, the appellate court...

 

HTMLPlaintiff Stated Bad Faith Claim When Alleging That Insurer’s Adjuster Admitted a Basis for Loss as to Which Coverage Was Due, But Insurer Later Denied Coverage (New Jersey Federal)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published on March 19, 2015
In Bannon v. Allstate Insurance Company, a Hurricane Sandy case, the policy provided “that coverage for dwellings or other structures did not include loss caused by ‘flood, including, but not limited to, surface water, waves, tidal water or overflow of any body of water or spray from...

 

HTMLNew Jersey Supreme Court Finds Um Bad Faith Claim Barred By Res Judicata, But Refers The Following Issues To The Civil Practice Committee In Connection With The Scope And Applicability Of New Jersey’s Rules To Um Claims
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published on March 17, 2015
In Wadeer v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, New Jersey’s Supreme Court took the opportunity to address potential changes in the Rules of Civil Procedure in the context of first party bad faith claims. In this uninsured motorist case, the plaintiff insured was injured by a driver...

 

HTMLDon't Mess With Texas Adjusters In Hail Damage Claims
Jennifer L. Gibbs; Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published by Texas Law360 on February 6, 2015
Texas hail claim policyholder lawyers, like many plaintiffs¿ lawyers, clearly prefer to be in state court rather than federal court. To accomplish this and prevent the defendant insurer from properly removing the lawsuit to federal court, Texas policyholder attorneys simply sue the adjuster (who,...

 

HTMLTexas Claims Are Getting Nasti: The Insured's Burdens
Andrew A. Howell; Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published by Texas Law360 on March 2, 2015
Texas courts have long taken the position that ¿when covered and excluded perils combine to cause an injury, the insured must present some evidence affording the jury a reasonable basis on which to allocate damages.¿ ¿Failure to provide evidence upon which a jury or court can allocate damages...

 

HTMLEven Where Court Rules against Insurer’s Interpretation of Policy Language, No Bad Faith Can Exist Where That Interpretation Is Reasonable (Middle District)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published on March 11, 2015
In Gray v. Allstate Indemnity Company, the insured asserted breach of contract claim and bad faith claims due to the insurer’s alleged wrongful denial and refusal to pay insurance benefits for his fire loss claim, which was the result of vandalism. The insurer asserted that the property was...

 

HTMLERISA Preemption Defense Sufficient To Set Aside Default on State Law Claims (Middle District)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 1, 2015, previously published on March 10, 2015
In Davis v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., the insured brought claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and bad faith under the Pennsylvania Unfair Insurance Practices Act (“UIPA”), 40 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1171.1 et seq., pursuant to 42 Pa....

 

HTMLConcussion Litigation: The Next Frontier
Anthony B. Corleto, Jae Hong Lee; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 31, 2015, previously published on March 13, 2015
By now everyone has heard about the widely reported concussion lawsuits - former professional players suing because they claim to suffer from a form of brain injury, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), linked to repetitive head trauma. The condition has afflicted athletes across the spectrum of...

 

HTMLFederal Government Issues Long-awaited Final Rules Governing Fracking on Federal Land and Indian Land
Carl J. Pernicone, Kathleen D. Wilkinson; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 31, 2015, previously published on March 23, 2015
On March 20, 2015, the Department of the Interior’s (DOI’s) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued its long-awaited “final” rules governing hydraulic fracturing operations on federal lands and land owned by Indian tribes.

 

HTMLTexas High Court Confirms Exclusivity of Texas Workers’ Compensation Claim Remedy, Even for Alleged “Independent Injuries”
Susan Abbott Schwartz, Valeri C. Williams; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 31, 2015, previously published on March 20, 2015
In a highly anticipated decision, the Texas Supreme Court emphasized its commitment to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas Division of Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) to deal with and respond to claims arising out of the investigation, handling and settling of workers’ compensation...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>