Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (6755)

  
Documents on insurance
 

View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLNew York Practice: Responding to the Complaint
Angela M. Evangelista; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
This article will address the issues that should be evaluated when preparing an answer. It pertains to answers in New York State courts and, to a limited extent, answers in federal court in the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York.

 

HTMLCalifornia Appellate Court Finds No Malicious Product Tampering Coverage for Westland’s Ground Beef
Joseph F. Bermudez, Suzanne M. Meintzer; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 11, 2015
In 2008, Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd. (Windsor) purchased Westland/Hallmark Meat Company’s (Westland’s) ground beef as an ingredient to be used in its José Olé® frozen food products. On January 30, 2008, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) suspended...

 

HTMLAlleging That Insurer Maliciously Audited And Re-Adjusted Premiums Did State A Claim For Breach Of The Duty Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing, Even Where Claims Handling Not Involved; Attorneys’ Fees Not Permitted; Punitive Damages Could Be Pursued (New Jersey Federal)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 26, 2015
In LM Ins. Corp v. All-Ply Roofing Co. the insured alleged, among other things, that the insurer audited its premiums, and reclassified its employees, as revenge for underreporting income, and that this stated a bad faith claim. The insurer argued there are no recognizable bad faith claims in New...

 

HTMLCourt Refuses To Universalize Bad Faith From Simple Denial Of Coverage In The Absence Of Specific Evidence Of Bad Faith (Philadelphia Federal)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on January 12, 2015
In Easy Corner, Inc. v. State National Insurance Company, the court made clear the significance of a bad faith’s plaintiff’s need to prove something more than negligence, or that an insurer was simply wrong on coverage. In that case, the court granted summary judgment to the insurer...

 

HTMLNarrowing the Scope of Medical Expert Qualifications and Testimony under the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
Angeline C. Panepresso; Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015
As a general principle, the standard for qualification as an expert witness in Pennsylvania is a liberal one. Specifically, the test for qualifying as an expert is whether the expert has any reasonable pretension to specialized knowledge on the subject at issue, and the weight to be given to such...

 

HTMLCourt Dismisses Bad Faith Claim To The Extent It Sought Emotional Damages Under The Bad Faith Statute, Finding The Pennsylvania Statute Prescribes Specific Remedies (Middle District)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on February 10, 2015
In Hoffman v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., plaintiffs brought suit alleging a claim of breach of insurance contract and a statutory bad faith claim. Plaintiff purchased a homeowners’ insurance policy from the insurer, after which a fire rendered the home uninhabitable. The firefighters at...

 

HTMLUIM Bad Faith Plaintiff Adequately Pleads Claim Where Carrier Switches Positions On Basis For Denial (Philadelphia Federal)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on January 9, 2015
In Lyman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, plaintiffs brought breach of contract and bad faith claims against their UIM insurer. The carrier sought to dismiss the claims, asserting they were mere boilerplate and could not stand under Twombly. The court disagreed.

 

HTMLPlaintiff’s Uim Bad Faith Claim Narrowly Survives Summary Judgment Because Of Muddled Record As To What Caused Delays (Middle District)
Fineman Krekstein Harris P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on January 30, 2015
In Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, plaintiff brought a UIM bad faith case, with the chief issues focusing on the 39 month time period between the claim being asserted and the filing of suit. There were three areas at issue on cross motions for summary judgment as to this...

 

HTMLIndemnification by Insurance Precluded under Wyoming Anti-indemnity Statute in Oil & Gas Personal Injury Coverage Dispute
Cathleen H. Heintz; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on January 16, 2015
On December 19, 2014, the Federal District Court in Wyoming issued a decision in Lexington Insurance Company v. Precision Drilling Co., LP, et al., D. Wyo., Case No. 12-cv-070-J, extending the reach of the anti-indemnity statute, Wyoming Statute §30-1-131, to preclude coverage of a drilling...

 

HTMLNJ Supreme Court Issues Companion Decisions That Impact Insurers’ Handling of UM/UIM Matters and Address New Jersey’s “Fairly Debatable” Bad Faith Standard
Thomas F. Quinn; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 5, 2015, previously published on March 2, 2015
On February 18, 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued companion decisions - Badiali v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Group and Wadeer v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Group - that impact insurers’ handling of UM/UIM matters and address New Jersey’s “fairly...

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>