martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Question Remitted to the Court a Second Time for Redetermination |
October 26, 2012
Previously published on October 22, 2012
The Court of Appeal remitted a case to the Court, requiring the Court to redetermine whether Corlac had infringed a method claim by inducement. On redetermination, the Court found that the Court of Appeal did not disturb its finding relating to the second part of the test for inducement, namely that Corlac’s instruction manual instructed the practice of the claimed method and therefore this finding was res judicata. This is an appeal from the Court’s finding.
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
| | View More Library Documents By... | | | | |
| | | | Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Overview |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|