Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


This is Patent Pending? Really?




by:
Donna Ray Berkelhammer
Sands Anderson PC - Raleigh Office

 
August 3, 2012

Previously published on July 30, 2012

I succumbed to a chip-and-dip bowl shaped like a flip-flop on sale at the grocery store check-out line. As I was washing it, I noticed “Made in China” and “Patent Pending” stamped on the bottom. What in the world is patentable about a novelty chip bowl?

Something is patentable when it is a new, nonobvious and useful invention (typically a process, machine, article of manufacture, composition of matter, or, as the patent law calls it, an ornamental design of an article of manufacture (a “design patent”).

To my mind (and I’ve been wrong before) nothing seems patentable about this flip-flop bowl.

What is the benefit of claiming something is “patent-pending” and what is the penalty for falsely claiming patent-pending?

A US patent gives the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States during the term of the patent. Marking a product as patent pending gives notices that the owner is seeking patent protection, and exact copying may be patent infringement.

If someone ignores the notice, and manufactures a similar product that is found to be infringing, the infringer may be guilty of “willful infringement” which carries much stiffer penalties. The patent-pending designation also allows an infringement suit before the patent actually issues.

Under current U.S. Patent law, it is considered false marketing to use “patent pending” when there is no patent application filed, or the application is no longer active (abandoned or rejected). Under 35 USC Section 292, the public can sue the product manufacturer on behalf of the government for the sum of not more than $500 per each offense (ie, each item manufactured). This is referred to as a qui tam action, where the government seeks the help of the public to control false marking.

I still think the “patent pending” notice was false marketing on this particular product, but I don’t intend to dip my toe into a qui-tam action.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Donna Ray Berkelhammer
Practice Area
 
Intellectual Property
 
Sands Anderson PC Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation