Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (10865)

  
Documents on intellectual property
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTML“Wanton or Malicious Behavior”: How will the Supreme Court Revise the Willful Patent Infringement Rules?
Ankwei Chen; Lee Tsai Partners Attorneys-at-Law;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2016
Last October, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to a pair of cases from the Federal Circuit, Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer Inc. regarding the standard for determining when enhanced damages for patent infringement should be granted. Namely, the sole...

 

HTMLChallenges with the Implementation of a Right to Be Forgotten in Canada
Éloïse Gratton; Borden Ladner Gervais LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2016, previously published on April 28, 2016
In May 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), exercising jurisdiction over twenty-eight E.U. member states, issued a landmark decision in Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. The CJEU in this case pronounced a broad precedent: all European...

 

HTMLThe Federal Court of Appeal Determines the Incorrect Date to Assess Obviousness-Type Double Patenting, but Leaves the Determination of the Correct Date for Another Day
Adrian J. Howard, Beverley Moore, Chantal Saunders; Borden Ladner Gervais LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 26, 2016, previously published on April 28, 2016
The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld an earlier decision (2015 FC 17) prohibiting Mylan from obtaining its Notice of Compliance until after the impugned patent expires. Mylan had alleged that Eli Lilly's patent was invalid on the basis of obviousness-type double-patenting and for lack of utility...

 

Adobe PDFKey Patent Law Decisions of 2015
Gregory A. (Greg) Castanias, Kelsey I. Nix, Patrick J. O'Rear, Shehla Wynne; Jones Day;
White Paper
May 25, 2016, previously published on April 2016
Significant U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions in 2015 will likely affect patent law stakeholders during and beyond 2016. Several key judgments regarding administrative agencies and patent law were rendered. In particular, several issues surrounding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...

 

HTMLThe Potential Impact of Brown v. Canada on Ownership of Intellectual Property by Employers
LuAnne Morrow; Borden Ladner Gervais LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 23, 2016, previously published on May 2, 2016
Most employers, especially those who are active in research and development, as a matter of practice have employees sign agreements that specify the obligations of the employee to disclose inventions to the employer and ensure that intellectual property developed by the employee is assigned to the...

 

HTMLNew Federal Trade Secret Law
Jeffrey G. Sheldon; Leech Tishman;
Legal Alert/Article
May 20, 2016, previously published on May 3, 2016
Congress has passed, and it is expected that President Obama will sign, a Federal trade secret law.

 

HTMLImplementing the Whistleblower Immunity Notice Provision under the Recently-Enacted Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act
Ann G. Fort, Matt Gatewood, Peter G. Pappas, William L. Warren, Gail L. Westover; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 20, 2016, previously published on May 18, 2016
The Defend Trade Secrets Act, signed into law on May 11, 2016, includes a whistleblower immunity notice provision. An employer that wants to preserve maximum recoveries for misappropriation against an employee should take action now.

 

HTMLITC ALJ Potentially Weakens R&D-Based Domestic Industry
Richard (Rich) Fieman, Blaney Harper, David M. (Dave) Maiorana; Jones Day;
Legal Alert/Article
May 18, 2016, previously published on April 2016
On April 26, 2016, International Trade Commission ("ITC") Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") Lord issued the public version of her final initial determination ("ID") in Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits Containing Same, ITC Inv....

 

HTMLA First Amendment Right to Disparaging Trademarks?: U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Review Federal Circuit Decision Holding Ban on Disparaging Marks Unconstitutional
Gregory A. (Greg) Castanias, John G. Froemming, Anna E. Raimer, Lauren L. Refinetti, Meredith M. Wilkes; Jones Day;
Legal Alert/Article
May 18, 2016, previously published on April 2016
Is the Lanham Act's prohibition on the registration of disparaging trademarks invalid under the First Amendment? This question was presented to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 20, 2016, by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), which filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari,...

 

HTMLDefend Trade Secrets Act Set to Become Law
Clifford R. Atlas, Peter R. Bulmer, Erik J. Winton; Jackson Lewis P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 18, 2016, previously published on April 28, 2016
For the first time, there will be a federal private right of action for misappropriation of trade secrets. The Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), passed by both houses of Congress, is headed to President Barack Obama for his signature and his office has stated it “strongly...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>