Search Results (4773)
Documents on internet e commerce
Show: results per page
|5 Practice Tips for Law Firms as Data Breach Spotlight Swings Their Way|
Jason C. Gavejian, Joseph J. Lazzarotti, Damon W. Silver; Jackson Lewis P.C.;
June 20, 2016, previously published on June 9, 2016While data breach incidents affecting the entertainment, retail, healthcare, and financial industries have garnered more attention in past years, the data breach spotlight recently shifted to law firms.
|DHS Issues Final Information Sharing Guidelines|
Sutherland Asbill Brennan LLP;
June 20, 2016, previously published on June 16, 2016The Department of Homeland Security has issued final guidance on the implementation of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015. The final guidance documents include: Guidance to Assist Non-Federal Entities to Share Cyber Threat Indicators and Defensive Measures with Federal Entities under...
|PCI DSS 3.2: It’s Here, What Does It Mean for You?|
Cynthia J. Larose, Julia M. Siripurapu; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
June 19, 2016, previously published on May 9, 2016The Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) has released a new version of its data security standard for the protection of cardholder data, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). PCI DSS applies to all entities involved in payment card processing, including...
|Corporate Divorce Series: Online Dating, The Bachelor, and Predicting Successful Employment Relationships|
Jennifer B. Rubin; Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky Popeo P.C.;
June 17, 2016, previously published on April 4, 2016If there is a predictive model for dating, why can’t the same model apply to the employment relationship?
|Cyber-Security and the Rise of the Vigilante Hacker|
Ruth E. Promislow, Lauren R. Shneer; Bennett Jones LLP;
June 16, 2016, previously published on May 19, 2016In the world of cyber hacks and leaks, there are two general categories of players: the fraudsters who steal data in order to obtain a profit, and the “hacktivists” who expose data, purportedly for the greater good.
|Supreme Court Rejects Lawsuits by Plaintiffs Who Cannot Show "Real" Injury|
Darren K. Cottriel, Meir Feder, Daniel J. (Dan) McLoon, Brian J. Murray, John A. Vogt; Jones Day;
June 16, 2016, previously published on May 2016On May 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339, a closely watched case addressing whether federal lawsuits can be filed by plaintiffs who have suffered no concrete injury aside from the violation of a federal statute. The case is of particular interest to...
|E-Commerce in Europe: The Beginning of the End for Geo-blocking?|
Antoni Bolecki, Christoph Enaux, Simon Harms, Gillian Sproul, Hans Urlus; Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp.k.;
June 14, 2016, previously published on June 2, 2016On May 25, 2016, the European Commission (the Commission) published three legislative proposals designed to boost cross-border e-commerce within the European Union (the EU) that will have an imminent impact on companies doing online business in the EU.
|Dual Decisions Provide Narrow Path for Plaintiffs to Establish Standing in Data Breach and Cybersecurity Suits|
Keith M. Gerver, Joseph V. Moreno; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
June 8, 2016, previously published on May 23, 2016Last week, decisions by the United States Supreme Court and the Northern District of Georgia provided further guidance regarding the narrow path required for a class action plaintiff to successfully establish Article III standing in a data breach claim brought in federal court. In Spokeo, Inc. v....
|Does a CGL Carrier Owe a Duty to Defend Claims Involving Cybersecurity Breaches?|
Gary A. Hamblet; Morris Polich & Purdy LLP;
June 8, 2016, previously published on May 5, 2016One of the hottest issues for general liability carriers is whether they owe a duty to defend insureds who have been sued as the result of a breach of cybersecurity. The quick, simplistic response is that a CGL policy provides no coverage for cybersecurity breaches because the claimant did not...
|Supreme Court: ‘Actual Injury’ Needed to Establish Standing to Sue for Violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act|
James A. McKenna; Jackson Lewis P.C.;
June 7, 2016, previously published on May 20, 2016Plaintiffs must show they suffered from an actual injury, not just a “bare procedural violation,” in order to sue in federal court, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in its long-awaited decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339 (May 16, 2016).