martindale.com
Legal Library
|
New Jersey Supreme Court Reaffirms Rendine Fee-Shifitng Analysis by Emily J. Bordens
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office
Michael T. Hensley
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office
Dennis Kadian
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office
Andrée Peart Laney
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office
Jed L. Marcus
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office
Tracey Salmon-Smith
Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office
|
|
February 7, 2012
Previously published on February 2012
On January 25, 2012, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in Walker v. Guiffre, Case Nos. 72-10, 100- 10 (N.J. Jan. 25, 2012), reaffirmed the framework established in Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292 (1995), for awarding attorneys’ fees pursuant to statutory fee-shifting provisions, including those sought pursuant to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“NJLAD”). The Walker decision also provides further explanation of feeshifting principles to litigants.
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
| | View More Library Documents By... | | | | |
| | | | Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation Overview |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|