Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Summary of North Carolina "Unemployment Insurance Integrity" Rules




by:
Robin E. Shea
Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP - Winston-Salem Office

 
December 26, 2013

Previously published on December 19, 2013

As Constangy reported earlier this week, the federal Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act of 2011 requires all states to adopt measures designed to ensure that employers respond to unemployment claims promptly and "adequately." The following is a summary of North Carolina's rule, adopted in response.

Please note that the changes may require you to provide more information to the N.C. Department of Employment Security than you have done in the past, even when you do not intend to contest unemployment claims.

Employers in North Carolina are now required to respond to the "Request for Separation Information from Employer" form (500AB) within 14 calendar days. The 14-day period runs from the date that the form is sent, not the date that it is received by the employer.

To be "adequate," the employer's response must provide the "who, what, where, why and how" of the termination - in short, "sufficient facts to enable the DES to make a correct determination under the law without having to contact the employer to obtain any additional information."

If the DES determines that the employer has a "pattern" of non-compliance (that is, untimely or inadequate responses), the employer's account "may not be relieved of charges for benefits erroneously paid to the individual." This could affect the employer's UI rating.

The North Carolina rule defines "pattern" as the lesser of the following during the prior year:

*Two or more untimely or inadequate responses, or

*Untimely or inadequate responses in more than 2 percent of the total requests sent to the employer or its agent.

As noted in our earlier Client Bulletin, employers who use third-party administrators to handle their unemployment claims will need to ensure that the TPAs are aware of the new requirements and are responding to claims in a timely manner. Some TPAs have been untimely in the past, even to the point of missing scheduled hearings.

The new requirements may not be too significant as applied to employees whose claims are being contested. However, many employers who had elected not to contest unemployment claims were accustomed to providing minimal information to the DES to avoid disqualifying the employee. Now, the safest course in that event may be to provide the details in a timely manner to the DES while noting that they do not contest the claim. At that point, the DES would have timely and "adequate" information but of course would make the decision as to whether the employee could receive benefits. It is possible that, in some cases, the details will result in a disqualification regardless of the employer's desire. It is hoped that the DES will provide more specific guidance in the future, or that the General Assembly will enact a statute that complies with the TAAEA but allows sufficient flexibility for employers and employees.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Robin E. Shea
Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP
 
Winston-Salem Office
Practice Area
 
Labor & Employment
 
Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation