Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results





Practice Area Resource Centers

We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Bankruptcy; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation and more...

 






Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (51)

  
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

Adobe PDF15-Second Advertising Law Alert - Discontinued "Fresh"-Related Marketing Permanently Enjoined
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 3, 2013, previously published on March 29, 2013
Although the jury found that Plaintiff failed to prove any lost sales, it awarded Plaintiff $7.2 million of Defendants’ profits for willful violations of the Lanham Act’s false advertising provisions. Yesterday, the Court ruled that, despite that award and notwithstanding that...

 

Adobe PDFFTC Issues Awaited POM Decision; Ducks Key Substantiation Issue
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 28, 2013, previously published on January 17, 2013
The Federal Trade Commission released yesterday its long-awaited decision on alleged drug claims made for POM Wonderful products and the substantiation needed to make such claims.

 

HTMLALJ Clarifies Evidence Needed to Support Health-Related Ad Claims
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2012, previously published on May 22, 2012
Pom Wonderful won some, but lost more in a massive initial decision by the Federal Trade Commission's Chief Administrative Law Judge, released today.

 

HTMLFDCA and FDA REGS Preempt Lanham Act; Cal. Ad Law Clarified
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 21, 2012, previously published on May 18, 2012
The Ninth Circuit today issued its long-awaited opinion in Pom Wonderful LLC v. The Coca Cola Co.*

 

HTMLBlue-Sky Decision on Materiality and Damages Enhancement
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 20, 2012, previously published on March 15, 2012
How to prove the essential element of materiality and the standard for enhancing damage awards were among several key issues in a recent 9th Circuit Lanham Act false advertising case decision.* (Not covered here are trademark and cybersquatting issues in the case).

 

HTMLRequired Graphic Cigarette Labeling Held Unconstitutional
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 8, 2012, previously published on March 7, 2012
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's rule mandating the use of dramatic graphic images on cigarette labeling was found unconstitutional recently.

 

HTMLMichael Jordan's Judicial Air Ball
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 23, 2012, previously published on February 17, 2012
When is speech "commercial" and what is an "advertisement"? A recent federal decision addresses these fundamental questions in an eyebrow-raising fashion.

 

HTMLSnow Job Gets Icy Reception
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 14, 2012, previously published on February 14, 2012
Ordering corrective advertising as part of a preliminary injunction is not a common remedy in Lanham Act false advertising cases. But it happened recently in Wisconsin.

 

HTMLTwombly-Iqbal Challenges Come to Lanham Act Advertising Cases
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 20, 2012, previously published on January 19, 2012
A Lanham Act advertising case was challenged recently under the heightened pleading standard required in all civil cases by the Supreme Court's Twombly and Iqbal opinions. An apparent intent of this standard is to give defendants a better chance to rid themselves of questionable litigation before...

 

HTMLThe Not-So-Sweet Smell of Unsuccessful Testing
Richard J. Leighton; Keller and Heckman LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 9, 2012, previously published on January 5, 2012
A disgusting recent Lanham Act false advertising decision contains two important reminders about making sensory test establishment claims: Make sure your test proves what you advertise and be suspicious of implausible results.

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  Next