Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (9971)

  
Documents on Intellectual Property
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLViability of Certain Internet and Software Patents Reconfirmed in DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com
Bill Blonigan; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 23, 2015, previously published on December 9, 2014
For those following the law of patent eligibility in the United States, a December 5, 2014 precedential decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a patent on webpage-display technology is patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. A slew of recent court decisions have gone...

 

HTMLUnited States Patent and Trademark Office Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility
Robert Irani; Bennett Jones LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 23, 2015, previously published on December 17, 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has published its 2014 Interim Eligibility Guidance of Subject Matter Eligibility for use by USPTO personnel in determining subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 of the United States Patent Act, which we wrote about here. The Guidance does not...

 

HTMLPatent and IP Wishes 2015
Stephen G. Kunin; Oblon McClelland Maier Neustadt L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 23, 2015
Steve Kunin shared his Patent and IP Wishes for 2015 with IPWatchdog editor Gene Quinn.

 

HTMLVersata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings
Martin Bader, Kayla Page; Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 23, 2015, previously published on November 24, 2014
In a recent decision, Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc., No. 2014-1468 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2014), the Federal Circuit ordered the District of Delaware to stay district court litigation pending a covered business method (CBM) review, reversing the district court’s decision to...

 

HTML“I Told the Waiter There Was a Fly in My Soup!” - A Little More Freedom for User Outrage on Yelp and other Social Media Sites
Mark A. Fischer; Duane Morris LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 22, 2015, previously published on November 21, 2014
“The worst meal I ever had. And the service sucked, too.” Can you legally say that kind of thing about a restaurant on social media sites like Yelp? Those long, eye-glazing terms of service (sometimes called “terms of use,” “end-user terms of service,” etc.) in...

 

HTMLWho is the Inventor?
Martin P.J. Kratz; Bennett Jones LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 20, 2015, previously published on November 14, 2014
Enthusiastic entrepreneurs consult with patent agents about the protection of their new product. Often a successful team for an entrepreneurial business includes someone with technical skills, someone with marketing skills, someone providing business direction as well, of course, with one or more...

 

HTMLThe Internet of Things and Canadian Copyright Law
Lisa K. Abe-Oldenburg; Bennett Jones LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
January 20, 2015, previously published on September 23, 2014
Many of you have read about the dispute over copyright ownership of the monkey-selfie, where a primate took a digital photo that went viral and for which the owner of the camera tried to claim ownership. Ultimately the U.S. Copyright Office, in its draft Compendium of the U.S. Copyright Office...

 

HTMLComputer and Software Related Innovation - Is There A Rationale For Filing Software Patent Applications in Canada?
Timothy Bailey; Field Law;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2015, previously published on November 18, 2014
Intellectual property law provides a number of avenues to protect investments that innovators make in developing and marketing software. Securing one or more intellectual property rights is critical in acquiring and maintaining an edge in competitive markets.

 

HTMLALJ Bullock Rules On Motion To Compel And Orders Macronix To Show Cause Why It Should Not Be Sanctioned In Certain Flash Memory Chips (337-TA-893)
Katherine Cappaert, Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2015, previously published on December 17, 2014
On December 4, 2014, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 63 (dated October 31, 2014) in Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-893).

 

HTMLIntellectual Asset Management Best Practices - Part 2
Richard Stobbe; Field Law;
Legal Alert/Article
January 19, 2015, previously published on November 18, 2014
In Part 1, we looked at three important steps in starting an intellectual asset management process within your organization. “Intellectual assets” can include the know-how and intellectual capital within your organization together with registered and unregistered intellectual property...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>