martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Search Results (193) Documents on Intellectual Property, Manufacturing, Construction Show: results per page Sort by:  | Think You Won? You May Still Need to Appeal
Christopher K. Albert, Brian T. Moriarty; Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article May 15, 2013, previously published on May 8, 2013 In Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc., the Federal Circuit recently held that a district court may not re-open a final judgment as to patent validity that was not raised by either party in a prior appeal. The “not invalid” judgment cannot be re-opened even when...
| | ALJ Rogers Rules On Motion To Strike Complainants’ Interrogatory Responses And Expert Reports In Certain Rubber Resins (337-TA-849)
Eric W. Schweibenz, Thomas C. Yebernetsky; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article April 30, 2013, previously published on April 26, 2013 On April 12, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 36 (dated March 5, 2013) in Certain Rubber Resins and Processes for Manufacturing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-849).
| | Federal Circuit to Reconsider 15-Year Claim Construction Position: Patent Holders and Their Counsel on Watch
Maria L. Cedroni, Deirdre E. Sanders; Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article April 10, 2013, previously published on April 8, 2013 Recently, in the case of Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a Petition for rehearing en banc on an essential area of patent law, namely, claim construction. In the Order granting the Petition, the Federal Circuit has...
|  | Intellectual Property Issues in Construction Agreements
Samantha C. Kernahan; McLennan Ross LLP;
Legal Alert/Article March 28, 2013, previously published on Spring 2013 It may seem that discussion of Intellectual Property, a form of intangible asset, does not belong in the context of construction agreements. Contrary to that perception, intellectual property issues are especially relevant wherever designs, methodologies and analytical data support the goods and...
| | ALJ Bullock Grants Motion To Terminate Investigation As To Menard And Pass & Seymour In Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (337-TA-739)
Eric W. Schweibenz; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article February 7, 2013, previously published on February 4, 2013 On February 4, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 76 in Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-739).
| | ALJ Bullock Grants Motion to Show Cause in Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (337-TA-739)
John F. Presper, Christopher Ricciuti; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article January 31, 2013, previously published on January 29, 2013 On January 25, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 75 granting Complainant Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.’s (“Leviton”) motion for an order directing Respondents Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corp., Shanghai Jia AO Electrical Co., Ltd., American Electric Depot Inc.,...
| | What is Cool About Additive Manufacturing? PTO Event Today Shows the Latest for This Economic Engine
J. Steven Rutt; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article January 31, 2013, previously published on January 24, 2013 I attended today the USPTO partnership meeting on “additive manufacturing” (aka 3D Printing). The content was excellent, covering both talks and demonstrations. Companies presenting included 3D Systems, Stratasys, Shapeways, MakerBot, Ex One, and EOS. Several hundred persons attended,...
| | ALJ Bullock Denies Motion To Compel In Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets (337-TA-855)
John F. Presper, Thomas C. Yebernetsky; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article January 30, 2013, previously published on January 28, 2013 On January 24, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 45 (dated January 14, 2013) in Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-855).
| | Design Patent Case Digest: Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.
David K.S. Cornwell, Tracy-Gene G. Durkin; Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.;
Legal Alert/Article January 29, 2013, previously published on January 22, 2013 Opinion: Plaintiff, Victor Stanley, Inc. sued Creative Pipe, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Design Patent D523,263, entitled End Frame for a Bench. Victor Stanley sells park benches, including a number of similar benches in the Framers Modern Series. Creative Pipe made competing park bench called...
| | Does the First Sale Rule Apply to Works Manufactured Outside the United States?
Jennifer K. Miller; Dinsmore & Shohl LLP;
Legal Alert/Article January 15, 2013, previously published on January 14, 2013 Under the Copyright Act, copyright owners are granted the exclusive right to prevent the unauthorized sale or distribution of copies of their works to the public. The first sale doctrine creates an exception to this rule by cutting off the copyright owner’s exclusive sales/distribution rights...
|
|