Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results





Practice Area Resource Centers

We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Bankruptcy; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation and more...

 






Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (911)

  
Documents on Intellectual Property, Technology & Science, Semiconductors
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTML"Use" of a Mark in the U.S.A.
Cory M. Amron, Joan C. Makley, William H. Oldach, Christopher M. Ott; Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2013, previously published on May 20, 2013
“Use” of a trademark or service mark under U.S. trademark law is often misunderstood. Even the best-intended trademark owners encounter unexpected, sometimes fatal, barriers in their attempts to register their marks and maintain their registrations.

 

HTMLALJ Gildea Denies Motions To Strike Testimony In Certain Semiconductor Chips With DRAM Circuitry (337-TA-819)
Lindsay J. Kile, John F. Presper; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 22, 2013, previously published on May 20, 2013
On April 23, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 18 and Order No. 19 (both dated March 26, 2013) regarding motions to strike certain portions of expert testimony in Certain Semiconductor Chips with DRAM Circuitry, and Modules and Products Containing Same (Inv. No....

 

HTMLALJ Rogers Denies Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G And/Or 4G Capabilities (337-TA-868)
John F. Presper; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 21, 2013, previously published on May 17, 2013
On May 10, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 27 denying Complainants InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc. and InterDigital Holdings, Inc.’s (collectively, “InterDigital”) motion for leave to amend the complaint in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G...

 

HTMLALJ Rogers Grants Motion to Strike Supplemental Interrogatory Response and Denies Motion to Respond Out Of Time in Certain Integrated Circuit Chips (337-TA-859)
Lisa M. Mandrusiak, John F. Presper; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 21, 2013, previously published on May 19, 2013
On May 9, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. Issued Order No. 19 granting Respondents LSI Corporation and Seagate Technology’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to strike Complainant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation’s (“Realtek”) supplemental interrogatory...

 

HTMLITC Decides To Review In Part Remand Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 in Certain Automated Media Library Devices (337-TA-746)
John F. Presper, Christopher Ricciuti; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 21, 2013, previously published on May 20, 2013
On May 10, 2013, the International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) issued a notice determining to review in part the Remand Initial Determination (“RID”) issued by Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock on March 26, 2013 finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Automated...

 

HTMLPatent Exhaustion and Self-Replicating Technologies
Antoinette F. Konski; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2013, previously published on May 13, 2013
Today in Bowman v. Monstanto Co., 569 U.S. -- (2013), a unanimous Supreme Court held that under the doctrine of patent exhaustion,the authorized sale of a patented article only gives the purchaser or any subsequent owner of the patented article the right to use or resell that article. It does not...

 

HTMLThe Supreme Court Affirms Patent Owner's Rights
David B. Cupar; McDonald Hopkins LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2013, previously published on May 14, 2013
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that patent exhaustion does not extend to the purchaser of a patented plant who then replicates it but does not pay the patent owner for that replication. Bowman v. Monsanto Co., No. 11-796.

 

HTMLALJ Gildea Grants-In-Part Respondents’ Motion To Strike In Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (337-TA-853)
John F. Presper, Thomas C. Yebernetsky; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2013, previously published on May 14, 2013
On May 9, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 35 (dated April 30, 2013) in Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-853).

 

HTMLALJ Gildea Denies As Moot Respondents’ Motion To Compel In Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (337-TA-853)
John F. Presper, Thomas C. Yebernetsky; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 16, 2013, previously published on May 14, 2013
On May 9, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 38 (dated May 1, 2013) in Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-853).

 

HTMLALJ Shaw Grants-In-Part Motions For Summary Determination In Certain Audiovisual Components (337-TA-837)
John F. Presper; Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
May 10, 2013, previously published on May 9, 2013
On May 7, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order No. 67 (dated February 27,2013) and Order No. 71 (dated March 5, 2013) in Certain Audiovisual Components and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-837).

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>