Search Results (1944)
Documents on Labor And Employment, Health Care
Show: results per page
|Is Malicious Prosecution a Potential Settlement Tool?|
Michael K. Brisbin, Laura E. Fannon; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
May 15, 2015, previously published on May 11, 2015In many instances, insurers are initially sued by plaintiffs with colorable claims seeking monetary recovery. During the course of litigation and through discovery, it sometimes becomes clear that the plaintiff’s claim or claims have no merit. Yet, the plaintiff and his or her counsel...
|Top 10 Considerations for Employers Addressing Ebola and Other Dangerous Contagious Diseases in the Workplace|
Lisa Handler Ackerman; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP;
May 7, 2015, previously published on January 2015The Ebola virus is the current example of workplace issues facing employers when a potentially deadly infectious disease spreads in the population.
|EEOC Issues Important Proposed Rule Governing Employer Wellness Programs|
Edward S. Schenk III; Williams Mullen;
April 27, 2015, previously published on April 22, 2015On April 16, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) published a proposed rule further addressing increasingly popular employer “wellness programs.” These programs generally incentivize employees to make healthier lifestyle choices by participating in nutrition and...
|New Policy Guidelines for Police Information Checks in British Columbia|
Larry Page; Davis LLP;
April 21, 2015, previously published on March 31, 2015 In the past, when employers in British Columbia requested police information checks on prospective employees, there were no clear guidelines on the type of information that would be provided. It was common for police information checks to include information about mental health issues relating to...
|Can You be “Served” or “Notified” Electronically?|
Pessin Katz Law P.A.;
April 6, 2015, previously published on February 27, 2015Two recent cases produced what appear to be different answers to the question posed above. In the first case, a U.S. District Court in Gardner v. Detroit Entertainment, (Case No. 12-14870, October 15, 2014, USDC, E. Mich.) ruled in favor of an employee who failed to open her employer’s email...
|ACA Cadillac Tax Proposed Regs: What Treasury and IRS Are Considering|
Stephanie O. Zorn; Jackson Lewis P.C.;
March 31, 2015, previously published on March 10, 2015The Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) added section 4980I to the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Code section 4980I applies to tax years after December 31, 2017, and provides a tax on high cost employer-sponsored health coverage - if the aggregate cost of employer-sponsored...
|Nurse’s Request to Use Cane in Behavioral Health Unit Not a Reasonable Accommodation, Court Rules|
Michael R. Bertoncini; Jackson Lewis P.C.;
March 30, 2015, previously published on February 24, 2015A nurse’s request to use a cane while working in a hospital’s behavioral health unit is not a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a federal district court in Florida has ruled. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Joseph’s...
|New York Whistleblower Court First to Address What It Means to Identify Overpayment under ACA's 60 Day Rule|
A.G. (Alec) Alexander; Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P.;
March 24, 2015, previously published on January 21, 2015For the first time since its enactment as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, a federal court in a whistleblower action will consider a provision requiring providers to return overpayments within sixty days of when they are “identified.” The upcoming decision by the United...
|The 2015 Employer Mandate Is Here; Have Health Care Strategies Becomes Limited for Plan Sponsors? - The Corporate Counselor, Vol. 29, Num. 12|
Jennifer S. Kiesewetter; Butler Snow LLP;
March 23, 2015, previously published on March 1, 2015The year 2015 is here and so is the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) employer “play or pay” mandate, which has been delayed, in total or in part, twice. On July 2, 2013, the Administration delayed the employer mandate for employers with more than 50 employees until 2015. Then on Feb....
|Limiting Off-Duty Access To The Hotel|
L. Brent Garrett; Fisher & Phillips LLP;
March 19, 2015, previously published on March 2, 2015Many hospitality employers are surprised to learn that employees have a right under federal labor law to access the exterior, nonworking areas of the hotel property in their off-duty hours for union or other protected concerted activities. Hospitality employers are also surprised to learn that...