Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (600)

  
Documents on Franchises
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLWill Petition Flow Through, Too? Texas Comptroller Seeks Review on Subcontractor Payments for Franchise Tax Purposes
Stephanie T. Do, Timothy A. Gustafson; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 4, 2014, previously published on August 28, 2014
The Texas Comptroller has filed a reply supporting its petition for review to the Texas Supreme Court in Titan Transp., LP v. Combs, 433 S.W.3d 625 (Tex. App. 3rd 2014). The taxpayer in Titan was in the business of hauling, delivering and depositing aggregate at construction sites, providing its...

 

HTMLCalifornia About to Make Franchise Terminations Harder
Michael A. Bowen, Roberta F. Howell; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 1, 2014, previously published on August 28, 2014
A bill on the verge of becoming law in California will sharply narrow the grounds for termination of franchises in that state, and may require re-examination of the terms of franchise agreements. Existing California law bars termination of franchises prior to expiration of their terms “except...

 

HTMLOntario Court Declares That Bare Trademark License Agreement Is Not Subject to Franchise Disclosure Legislation
Helen Fotinos, Brooke MacKenzie, Catherine M. Samuel, Adam Ship; McCarthy Tétrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 25, 2014, previously published on August 19, 2014
A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that a bare trademark license agreement was not subject to Ontario’s franchise legislation. The decision provides guidance to companies that wish to avoid the application of Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise...

 

HTMLCalifornia's "Doing Business" Standard Requires Neither Any "Doing" Nor Any "Business" in California
Stephen A. Burroughs, Pilar Mata; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 19, 2014, previously published on August 13, 2014
The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) issued a legal ruling determining that it will attribute the business activities of a multiple-member limited liability company classified as a partnership for tax purposes (LLC) to its members when determining whether such members are “doing...

 

HTMLActions May Speak Louder than Words: Can Franchise Agreements Protect Franchisors from Liability as Joint Employers?
David Dubberly, Ted P. Pearce; Nexsen Pruet, LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 14, 2014, previously published on August 5, 2014
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has created a buzz within the franchise community by announcing that McDonald's may be responsible as a "joint employer" for alleged unfair labor practices of some of its franchisees. Employees of franchisees have filed more than 180 unfair labor...

 

HTMLFood, Folks, and Franchise-Wide Liability: NLRB Signals Intent to Pound Square Joint Employer Peg Into Round Franchise Hole
Christopher G. Ward; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2014, previously published on August 11, 2014
A big part of what makes the franchise model of business attractive to small business owners is the opportunity to own and operate their own business, but with their entrepreneurial risk backstopped by a known regional or national brand. In turn, the franchisor facilitates the success of its...

 

HTMLEnforcing Quality Standards in Hotel Franchise Agreements
David L. Cahn; Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2014, previously published on August 6, 2014
Take-away. A franchisor’s diligence in conducting and documenting quality assurance inspections is as important as ever, particularly if the franchisor seeks to exercise its ultimate weapon - termination of the franchise agreement. Prudent inspection and documentation practices are...

 

HTMLAppeals Court Upholds "Silent Fraud" Jury Verdict under Franchise Investment Law
David L. Cahn; Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2014, previously published on August 6, 2014
Take-away: If your franchise offering document is silent on key issues, you can be liable if your people “oversell” to a potential franchisee. Better to deal with the issue in carefully vetted writing than to be surprised by something your people say off the cuff.

 

HTMLNLRB Franchisor-Liability Decision Could Reach Professional Services Firms
Dana S. Douglas, Stanley J. Parzen; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
August 7, 2014, previously published on August 5, 2014
A recent decision from the US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could open the door to new sources of liability for some professional services firms. The decision allows franchisors to be treated as “joint employers” along with their franchisees in labor complaints. In considering...

 

HTMLCalifornia: Franchise Tax Board Provides Guidance on Tax Liability of Corporate Members of Multi-Member LLCs
McDonald Hopkins LLC;
Legal Alert/Article
August 4, 2014, previously published on July 31, 2014
On July 22, 2014, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) provided guidance in Legal Ruling 2014-01 (Ruling) regarding when a corporation - including a limited liability company taxed as a corporation - is required to file a California return and pay any applicable taxes and fees because of its...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>