Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Internal Revenue Service Position on Performance-Based Compensation Changes Effective in 2010



by Jane Oglesby Francis View Biography
Rebecca L. Hudson View Biography
Holland & Hart LLP View Firm Credentials
Denver Office

Elizabeth A. Nedrow View Biography
Leslie Thomson View Biography
Holland & Hart LLP View Firm Credentials
Billings Office

Brenda R. Berg View Biography
Holland & Hart LLP View Firm Credentials
Denver Office

October 28, 2009

Previously published on October 22, 2009

Media scrutiny of executive compensation packages in publicly-traded companies is a clear consequence of the current economic crisis.  Even before now, however, executive compensation has been on the regulators’ agendas.  One of the tools the Internal Revenue Service has in its arsenal is Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).  Changes in how the IRS will enforce Section 162(m) go into effect in 2010.

Section 162(m) prevents public companies from deducting compensation over $1 million paid in a single year to the company’s CEO and four other highest paid officers.  A key exception to Section 162(m) is that “performance-based compensation” does not count toward the compensation limit.  To meet the definition of performance-based compensation, the compensation must be payable on attainment of performance goals that are set by a compensation committee of outside directors, and the material terms must be disclosed to and approved by the shareholders. 

Some employers set up performance-based compensation programs that pay benefits not only on achievement of the goals, but also in the event that the executive retired, was involuntarily terminated without cause, or terminated employment for good reason.  In several non-binding private letter rulings, the IRS previously indicated these additional payment triggers were acceptable.  But in a 2008 Revenue Ruling, the IRS changed course and determined that the additional payment triggers are not permissible.  Specifically, the IRS clarified that compensation will be exempt from Section 162(m) as performance-based compensation only if it is payable on achievement of the performance goals, or in the event of death, disability, or change of ownership or control. 

Because this ruling represented a dramatic change in position for the IRS, the IRS provided employers with a grace period for compliance.  The IRS said that the additional payment events are acceptable in plans where the performance period begins on or before January 1, 2009, and for employment contracts in effect on February 21, 2008.  This means that performance based programs in operation for calendar year 2010 must be revised to delete any provisions for payment on retirement or termination of employment, including for good reason.  Otherwise, payment of benefits under the program will constitute nondeductible compensation if it exceeds $1 million when aggregated with other compensation.  



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.