martindale.com
Legal Library
|
CAFC Reverses the Bose Case and Rejects Medinol's "Should Have Known" Standard in Fraud Cases |
September 13, 2009
Previously published on August 31, 2009
In a long-awaited decision that is likely to curtail the number of USPTO-based "fraud" claims, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") reversed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's ("Board") decision to cancel Bose Corp.'s WAVE registration in Bose Corp. v. Hexawave, Inc., 88 USPQ 2d 1332 (TTAB 2007). In summary, the CAFC rejected the strict Medinol standard of fraud, under which an entire registration was vulnerable to cancellation where a registrant knowingly or negligently made false representations as to some aspect of its mark (e.g. concerning the scope of use of its mark) - whether or not there was evidence of actual intent to deceive. Instead, the CAFC adopted a more traditional test for fraud: did the applicant [registrant] knowingly make false, material representations with the intent to deceive the PTO?
|
The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
Practice Area Resource Centers
|
|
RSS | Blog | Advertising Opportunities | Site Map | Contact Us