Article
Feeds
|
Ohio Upholds Statute of Repose But Bars Retroactive Application |
May 9, 2008
Previously published on March 2008
In Groch v. General Motors Corp., No. 2006-1914, 2008 WL 482845 (Ohio Feb. 21, 2008), the Ohio Supreme Court responded to a question certified to it concerning the statute of repose provision of the Ohio tort reform law.
|
The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. |
|
|