Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Abstract




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Ninth Circuit Rules That DOJ Tax Division Head Does Not Have to Attend Routine Settlement Conference



byDavid C. Cho
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - Washington Office

Thomas A. Cullinan
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - Atlanta Office

Joseph M. Depew
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - Atlanta Office

Mary E. Monahan
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - Washington Office

Daniel H. Schlueter
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - Washington Office

October 5, 2012

Previously published on October 2, 2012

The Ninth Circuit in U.S. v. U.S. District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands (“Northern Mariana Islands”), No. 11-72940, 2012 WL 3984406, recently granted relief to the government and directed a district court to vacate orders that directed the government to send a representative with full authority to settle a civil tax refund lawsuit to an initial settlement conference. Although the appellate court held that the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences, the Ninth Circuit found that the district court abused its discretion in ordering attendance by a representative with full settlement authority under the circumstances of the case. The Ninth Circuit cited two factors important to its determination: (1) the lowest-ranking official with settlement authority over the case was the Assistant Attorney General of the Tax Division (“Assistant Attorney General”) and it would be impractical to require the Assistant Attorney General to appear at all settlement conferences in all cases involving amounts within his or her settlement authority; and (2) the initial settlement conference was a matter of routine practice under the district court’s local rules, and the personal participation of the person able to make a final decision was not vital. While the practice of not sending a representative with ultimate settlement authority is fairly standard for the Department of Justice, the Ninth Circuit’s decision adds guidance with respect to an important issue for taxpayers, as settling a case can be more difficult when not dealing directly with the ultimate decision-maker.


 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
David C. Cho
Thomas A. Cullinan
Joseph M. Depew
Mary E. Monahan
Daniel H. Schlueter
Practice Area
 
Litigation
Taxation
 
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation