Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Arizona Court of Appeals Provides Expansive Business Income Definition




by:
Andrew D. Appleby
Christopher N. Chang
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP - New York Office

 
February 28, 2014

Previously published on December 24, 2013

The Arizona Court of Appeals upheld a broad definition of business income, adopting both the transactional and functional tests. The Court of Appeals stated that business income includes both income arising from transactions in a taxpayer’s regular course of business (the “transactional test”) and income from the acquisition, management, or disposition of tangible and intangible property used in a taxpayer’s regular course of business (the “functional test”). The Court of Appeals determined that the functional test was necessary because taxpayers would not include gain upon sale even though they could deduct business expenses related to the property before the taxpayer sold it. The Court of Appeals also rejected the liquidation exception stating that any such exception is inconsistent with the functional test. Harris Corp. v. Ariz. Dept. of Rev., Dkt. No. 1 CA-TX 11-0006 (Nov. 26, 2013).

 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Andrew D. Appleby
Christopher N. Chang
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
 
New York Office
Practice Area
 
Litigation
Taxation
 
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Overview