Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (18907)

  
Documents on litigation
 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLCourt Permits Beneficiary Designations By Telephone
Elinor P. Hindsley; Williams Mullen;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on February 12, 2015
In a somewhat surprising case, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that a participant may change his prior written beneficiary designation by a telephone call to the plan sponsor.

 

HTMLCAFC to Rehear Suprema: Disposition Could Have Significant Repercussions for ITC Jurisdiction
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on November 26, 2014
On February 5, 2015 the en banc Federal Circuit will hear oral argument in the matter of Suprema, Inc. v. ITC., Case No. 2012-1170 (Fed. Cir.). This rehearing reviews the controversial Federal Circuit opinion holding that “an exclusion order based on a violation of 19 U.S.C. §...

 

HTMLChina Further Opens Up to Foreign Banks
Patrick H. Hu, Peilin Liu; Jones Day;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on January 2015
Following the recent announcement of several crucial economic reforms by the People's Republic of China ("PRC") leadership, and eight years since the promulgation of China's Administrative Regulations on Foreign-Invested Banks (the "foreign banks regulations"), the PRC State...

 

HTMLALJ Lord Amends Ground Rules to Permit Reply Briefs
Michael B. Marion, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on November 24, 2014
On November 17, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Dee Lord amended her Ground Rules to permit parties filing motions to file a reply brief without first seeking leave from the ALJ. This presents a significant change in motions practice before ALJ Lord that differentiates her motions practice from the...

 

Adobe PDFUnited States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects from Avoidance Transfers of Fictitious Profits in Connection with Madoff Ponzi Scheme
Joel Moss, Brian Trust, Richard G. Ziegler; Mayer Brown LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 11, 2014
In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“Madoff”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed its broad and literal interpretation of section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides a safe harbor for transfers made in connection with a...

 

HTMLWhether Internal Investigation Is Required Deemed Irrelevant To Privilege Inquiry By Indiana Federal Court
Sutherland Asbill Brennan LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on February 26, 2015
In litigation involving two railroads’ responsibilities for separate train derailments, each railroad sought discovery of information protected by the other railroad as work product. Although the document-by-document specifics are not ascertainable based on the generalized commentary from the...

 

HTMLMore GMO Woes: Another Corn Exporter Sues Syngenta for its Failure to Isolate its GMO Corn
Michelle Gillette, Dominique L. Windberg; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 8, 2014
Last month, Archer Daniels Midland Co. (“ADM”) joined a slew of corn exporters and other stakeholders who have sued Syngenta based on allegations that China rejected these exporters’ products because Syngenta’s genetically modified corn seed, which contains a trait that...

 

HTMLSCC Holds Disclosure of Private Communications Engages Constitutional Rights
Lisa Martz; McCarthy Tetrault LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 2, 2014
In its Nov. 14, 2014 decision in Wakeling v. United States of America, 2014 SCC 72, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) (the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure) applies to the disclosure of communications...

 

HTMLNew Jurisdiction Rules Now in Force Across the European Union
Adam Rooney; Greenberg Traurig Maher LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on January 27, 2015
On Saturday 10 January 2015, Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012 (the Judgments Regulation) came into force. Its effect, from that date, is to change jurisdiction rules which apply directly to litigation in the courts of all 28 member states of the European Union (EU). For those based...

 

HTMLCAFC Finds Patent Claiming Software-Related Invention is Patentable
Sean Casey, Matthew A. Karambelas, Courtney Quish; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
February 27, 2015, previously published on December 10, 2014
For the first time since the Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l decision this past summer, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found that a patent claiming a software-related invention was patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (with...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>