Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Legal Library > Abstract




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Supreme Court Clarifies ADA "Direct Threat" Defense


by Charles J. Mataya View Biography
Boult, Cummings, Conners & Berry, PLC View Firm Credentials
Nashville Office

July 9, 2004

Previously published on June 11, 2002

In another decision impacting the manageability of the ADA in the workplace, the United States Supreme Court has unanimously held that the threat of harm to one's self, although not specifically listed in the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), is viable as part of the "job-related" and "business necessity" standards set out in the ADA. This settles a long-standing open issue under the ADA. Before this decision, many had argued that only the direct threat of "injury to others" could suffice as a safety issue defense under the Act.


 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.