Supreme Court Enforces Benefit Plan Reimbursement Provision

by James P. McElligott View Biography
McGuireWoods LLP View Firm Credentials
Richmond Office

Sally Doubet King View Biography
Larry R. Goldstein View Biography
McGuireWoods LLP View Firm Credentials
Chicago Office

Bruce M. Steen View Biography
McGuireWoods LLP View Firm Credentials
Charlotte Office

David F. Dabbs View Biography
Marc E. Purintun
McGuireWoods LLP View Firm Credentials
Richmond Office

More...

Articles by these authors

Articles by this firm

Articles by this topic

April 1, 2007

Previously published on May 17, 2006

On May 15, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that an ERISA health care plan may enforce the plan's provisions requiring reimbursement of plan benefits paid to a beneficiary from the settlement proceeds of the beneficiary's personal injury claim. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical...

Start New Search

View the full text of this article

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Search Legal Topics

Supreme Court Enforces Benefit Plan Reimbursement Provision

More...