Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


First-to-File Comments Due October 5, 2012




by:
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Foley & Lardner LLP - Washington Office

 
October 5, 2012

Previously published on October 4, 2012

Although the first-to-file provisions of the America Invents Act (“AIA”) do not take effect until March 16, 2013, public comments on the USPTO’s proposed implementing regulations are due by Friday, October 5, 2012. The USPTO has demonstrated that it takes public comments seriously, and modified some of the proposed rules for the provisions that took effect on September 16, 2012 in view of public comments. Applicants, practitioners and other stakeholders should not miss this opportunity to shape how the USPTO implements these significant changes to U.S. patent law.

Controversial Proposed Rules

The following proposed rules have garnered attention from commentators:

Formal Requirements

  • the requirement that certified copies of foreign priority applications be filed within certain (early) time periods
  • the requirement for nonprovisional applications that straddle the first-to-file effective date, for applicants to identify applications that include claims with an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013, or that include additional disclosure as compare to the earlier application
  • the ability of applicants to identify grace period inventor disclosures in the specification

The Meaning of “Sale” in § 102(a)(1)

  • the extent to which a “sale” must be “public” in order to qualify as prior art under § 102(a)(1)

Requirements for Invoking the Exceptions To § 102

  • the requirement (for all exceptions) to show that the inventor(s) invented the subject matter at issue
  • the requirement (for the exception for inventor-originated disclosures) to show an enabling communication from the inventor to another
  • the requirement (for the exception for shielding disclosures) of near identity between the shielding disclosure and the disclosure being disqualified
  • the ability of the USPTO to require an applicant to file a petition to institute a derivation proceeding if the applicant attempts to disqualify the prior art effect of a pending U.S. application that claims the same subject matter

Submitting Comments

Members of the public can submit written comments by email:

fitf-rules@uspto.gov

by postal mail:

Mail Stop Comments-Patents
Commissioner for Patents
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA, 22313-1450
Attention: Susy Tsang-Foster, Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration

or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see http://www.regulations.gov).



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Author
 
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Practice Area
 
Intellectual Property
 
Foley & Lardner LLP Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation