Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


SEC Sets Deadline for Smaller Reporting Companies to Provide SOX Independent Auditor Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting



by Kilpatrick Stockton LLP View Firm Credentials
Atlanta Office

October 13, 2009

Previously published on October 8, 2009

On Friday, October 2, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced a new and final deadline for smaller reporting companies to provide independent auditor assessment of their internal control over financial reporting in compliance with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The new deadline requires compliance by all public companies for fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010. As a result, smaller reporting companies with fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010 will be required to include this auditor attestation in their annual report for their 2010 fiscal year.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires a public company and its independent auditors to report to the public on the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls. Section 404(a), with which all public companies already are required to comply, requires that an issuer’s annual report include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, a report by management regarding the effectiveness of the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting, and a statement identifying the method used to evaluate the effectiveness of the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Smaller reporting companies – issuers with a public float below $75 million – had been given extra time to design, implement and document these internal controls before their auditors were required to attest to their effectiveness under Section 404(b). Most recently, auditor attestation had been delayed until December 15, 2009 so that the SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis could complete a study of whether additional guidance provided to company managers and auditors in 2007 was effective in reducing the costs of compliance. However, that study was published in September 2009, less than three months before the December 15, 2009 deadline. As a result, the SEC determined that additional time was “appropriate and reasonable so that small public companies and their auditors can better plan for the required auditor attestation.” In announcing this latest extension, the SEC made clear that there will be no further extensions of the compliance deadline.

Notably, the Office of Economic Analysis study concluded that Section 404 compliance costs vary with company size, compliance history, and compliance regime. Although larger companies incur higher compliance costs, smaller companies incur higher scaled costs relative to their assets, on average. The study found that annual Section 404 compliance involves a fixed cost that is unrelated to the size of the reporting company; however, compliance costs tend to decrease steadily after the first-year of compliance, implying that Section 404 compliance entails start-up costs that dissipate over time.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.