Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Driverless Car Technology - Legislation Slow to Keep Pace




by:
Ryan S. Bewersdorf
Foley & Lardner LLP - Detroit Office

 
April 16, 2013

Previously published on April 15, 2013

Major technology companies have already logged 300,000 miles on U.S. roads with self driving cars. Driverless (or automated or autonomous) vehicle technology is rapidly advancing and states are starting to enact legislation. Driverless car technology has the ability to attract billions in research dollars to those states that create the right legal framework for the development and testing of driverless vehicles. Tangible benefits of this technology include, safer roads, faster commutes, and increased mobility for persons with disabilities. While fully driverless cars are years away, at least one auto industry CEO predicts that driverless cars will be in showrooms by 2020.

A critical legal issue becomes who is liable when there is an accident where the driver, was by design, not in control of the vehicle. Who is to blame, the automaker, the occupant, the car’s owner, the supplier that designed or retrofitted the technology? Driverless car technology promises to be heavily regulated, not only by states, but federally by the NHTSA. Although there are no specific federal regulations yet, a patchwork of state laws is forming.

Nevada, California, and Florida already have passed laws governing driverless vehicles. Michigan is currently considering legislation. Governor Rick Synder (Michigan) in his January State of the State address called for Michigan to join other states in allowing self-driving vehicle research on the state’s roads. Michigan Senate Bill 169 was introduced on February 7, 2013. Michigan’s proposed bill allows for the testing of automated vehicles on the state’s roads provided there is a human operator in the vehicle to monitor performance, and if necessary, intervene. The Michigan legislation also exempts the vehicle manufacturer from civil liability for damages resulting from the conversion of the vehicle into an automated vehicle by another company or product. Florida’s law also similarly exempts vehicle manufactures from liability. In contrast, the laws in California and Nevada are silent as to vehicle manufacturer liability. In creating the future of the vehicle industry, automakers and suppliers need to be aware of how these laws will affect their liability in the future.

A copy of Michigan Senate Bill 169 can be found at http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2013-2014/billintroduced/Senate/pdf/2013-SIB-0169.pdf.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
 
Foley & Lardner LLP Overview


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas:Litigation;Intellectual Property;Real Estate;Corporate Law;Criminal Law;Bankruptcy;Immigration;Business Law;Insurance;Taxation;Labor & Employment;Commercial Law;Medical Malpractice;Trusts & Estates;Securities;International Law ;Health Care;Environmental Law;Construction Law;Workers' Compensation