Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Search Results (1892)

  
Documents on travel leisure hospitality
 

View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLToo Darn Bad: The Supreme Court Rejects Vindication of Federal Statutory Rights as a Ground to Invalidate Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
S. Elaine McChesney, John R. Snyder; Bingham McCutchen LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 1, 2013, previously published on June 24, 2013
The Supreme Court has definitively declared that contractual waivers of class arbitration are valid and enforceable even if the plaintiff’s cost of individually arbitrating a federal statutory claim would exceed the potential recovery. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, No....

 

Adobe PDFSupreme Court Holds That Express Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements Are Enforceable Even When The Expense Of Conducting Individual Arbitration Exceeds The Potential Recovery
Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick Pearson LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2013, previously published on June 20, 2013
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant, holding that a contractual waiver of the right to class arbitration is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") even if the cost of individual arbitration exceeds the...

 

HTMLGood News for Employers: Supreme Court Approves Class-Action Arbitration Waiver
Hinshaw Culbertson LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2013, previously published on June 25, 2013
In a significant victory for businesses and employers, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 20, 2013, that a class-action waiver in an arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) even if the costs of prosecuting the claim on an individual basis are...

 

Adobe PDFArbitration Agreements and Class Actions: Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement with Class Action Waiver, Narrowing the Scope of Ability to Avoid Such Agreements
Sullivan Cromwell LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2013, previously published on June 21, 2013
The United States Supreme Court yesterday continued its rigorous enforcement of arbitration agreements, including those containing waivers of class arbitration. The Court in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant held that a contractual waiver of class arbitration is enforceable under...

 

HTMLClass Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements Are Enforceable Even in Cases Involving “Small Dollar” Claims
Derek T. Teeter; Husch Blackwell LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 25, 2013, previously published on June 24, 2013
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court held that class action waivers contained in arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) even in cases involving “small dollar” claims that might otherwise not be prosecuted on an individual basis. In the court’s...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Upholds Class-Action Waivers in Antitrust Action in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Drinker Biddle Reath LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 24, 2013, previously published on June 20, 2013
The Supreme Court today announced its decision in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant. In a 5-3 decision authored by Justice Scalia, it found that an arbitration agreement’s class action waiver is enforceable even though the cost of individually prosecuting the claim exceeds...

 

Adobe PDFU.S. Supreme Court Affirms Waiver of Right to Class Action in Favor of Bilateral Arbitration
Edward P. Bonapfel, James B. Cash, Donald Houser, John D. Roesser, Louis A. Russo; Alston & Bird LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 24, 2013, previously published on June 21, 2013
Yesterday, in American Express Co. et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant et al., the U.S. Supreme Court issued another opinion in a long line of decisions championing the federal policy favoring arbitration. Simultaneously, the Court dealt a blow to litigants who would attempt to circumvent...

 

HTMLAnswers To Frequently Asked Questions Concerning California's Human Trafficking Notice Requirements
Michelle Brauer Abidoye; Ford & Harrison LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 21, 2013, previously published on June 18, 2013
In response to our June 6, 2013 Restaurant Industry Newsletter, we received several questions about whether California's human trafficking statute applies to all restaurants and drinking establishments. As a result, we are providing the following answers as a guide to help you determine whether you...

 

HTMLChild Labor Restrictions Could Impact Summer Hiring
Heath H. Edwards; Ford & Harrison LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 14, 2013, previously published on June 11, 2013
Everyone remembers their first summer job in high school. It was not only your first taste of what it meant to work for a living, but also your first taste of having some extra spending money for the weekend. One of the most popular industries in which people look for summer jobs is the...

 

Adobe PDFMassachusetts Court Rules on Regulatory Violations and Chapter 93A
Sugarman Rogers Barshak Cohen P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
June 6, 2013, previously published on June 2013
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has decided an important case on liability under the state’s consumer-protection statute, Chapter 93A. In Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc., which involved the death of a college student after he fell down a flight of stairs at a bar, the court...

 


View Page: <<  Prev  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next  >>