U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Needed for Money-Laundering Convictions

by Michael G. Considine View Biography
Andrew P. Gaillard View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

Patrick Hamilton View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Boston Office

Helen Harris View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

Dennis T. Kearney View Biography
John J. O'Reilly View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Morristown Office

Edgardo Ramos View Biography
Jeffrey Plotkin View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
New York Office

Stanley A. Twardy View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

More...

Articles by these authors

Articles by this firm

Articles by this topic

July 23, 2008

Previously published on Spring 2008

The Supreme Court recently decided an issue that had long split the circuits by ruling that the government need not prove intent to create the appearance of legitimate wealth in order to convict a defendant of money-laundering.

Start New Search

View the full text of this article

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Search Legal Topics

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Needed for Money-Laundering Convictions

More...