Department of Justice Issues Guidelines for Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements

by Michael G. Considine View Biography
Andrew P. Gaillard View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

Patrick Hamilton View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Boston Office

Helen Harris View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

Dennis T. Kearney View Biography
John J. O'Reilly View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Morristown Office

Jeffrey Plotkin View Biography
Edgardo Ramos View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
New York Office

Stanley A. Twardy View Biography
Day Pitney LLP View Firm Credentials
Stamford Office

More...

Articles by these authors

Articles by this firm

Articles by this topic

July 23, 2008

Previously published on Spring 2008

In the wake of congressional calls for reforms and oversight of the practices associated with deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements (see Day Pitney's White Collar Quarterly, Winter 2008, "Deferred Prosecution Agreements Draw Scrutiny"), the U.S. Department of Justice, in March 2008, issued guidelines for the "Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations."

Start New Search

View the full text of this article

The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Search Legal Topics

Department of Justice Issues Guidelines for Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements

More...