Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Ever More Kentucky Workers' Comp Cases Are Being Reversed




by:
R. Stephen Burke
Dressman Benzinger LaVelle psc - Crestview Hills Office

 
June 14, 2012

Kentucky's administrative law judges are finding more and more of their opinions are being reversed.  Both the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Board and the state Court of Appeals are routinely sending cases back to ALJs for further fact-finding.  In the past two months, seven of 21 comp cases (a ratio of 1 in 3) have been reversed, at least in part.  Two recent decisions illustrate this trend.

In Vowels v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center  (http://www.comped.net/opinions&under;recentdisp.php?ID=5565), the Workers' Comp Board ruled the ALJ had applied the wrong legal standard in deciding whether an award of benefits should be reduced because of a pre-existing condition.  St. Elizabeth argued that the ALJ should have decided whether a pre-existing active impairment existed at the time of injury.  Instead, the ALJ ruled that Vowel's award should not be reduced because she had no pre-existing active occupational disability.  The Workers's Comp board agreed with St. Elizabeth and sent the case back for further fact-finding.

In Park Terrace Health Care v. Thompson (http://www.comped.net/opinions&under;recentdisp.php?ID=5576), the ALJ had recited copious evidence in deciding that a work-related injury (falling ceiling tiles) had never occurred, nor caused any injury.  However, the ALJ also cited to some hearsay testimony of a co-worker.  Both the Workers' Comp Board and the Court of Appeals decided the case should be sent back to the ALJ for another decision with the hearsay testimony excluded.

Such scrutiny by the courts usually results in months of delays in the payment of benefits.  While scrutiny of workers' comp decisions is needed, the costs of such litigation and delays to claimants are areas that should bear examination.

 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.
 

View More Library Documents By...

 
Dressman Benzinger LaVelle psc
 
Crestview Hills Office
Crestview Hills Office
Practice Area
 
Workers Compensation
 
Dressman Benzinger LaVelle psc Overview