Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Legal Library > Article




Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected


Future of DOL's Overtime Amendments Uncertain



by Amy Wright Littrell View Biography
Ford & Harrison LLP View Firm Credentials
Atlanta Office

October 9, 2003

Previously published on October 3, 2003

In what appears to be a victory for organized labor, the House recently approved a Senate-passed provision that would block the Department of Labor's (DOL) proposed expansion of overtime exemptions for white-collar workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In a 221-203 vote, the House approved a procedural motion that instructs lawmakers to stop the DOL from taking any action that would cause workers to lose eligibility for overtime. The nonbinding motion requires lawmakers to include the provision in the final version of a spending bill that will fund the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education for the upcoming fiscal year. See House Approves Procedural Motion to Halt Final Overtime Regulation, Daily Labor Report, October 3, 2003, p. AA-1.

The impact of this motion is unclear. It remains to be seen whether House negotiators will comply and the White House has threatened to veto the entire spending bill if the provision is included.

The debate stems from the DOL's proposal to streamline the tests for determining whether white-collar workers are exempt from the FLSA's overtime requirements. Opponents of the DOL's proposed revision argue that it could deprive more than eight million workers of overtime pay, while the DOL has estimated the number at 644,000. Id.

Additionally, it is not clear whether the motion affects another part of the DOL's proposed amendments to the FLSA, which provides that workers who earn less than $22,100 per year would automatically be eligible for overtime pay. Lawmakers opposing the motion argue that it is so broadly worded that the DOL would be reluctant to do anything affecting workers' rights to overtime pay, while others argue that the motion does not deny the DOL the right to add a single worker to overtime coverage.

The DOL is continuing to work on its proposed revisions and is reviewing public comments that have been submitted.



 

The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not Martindale-Hubbell. This document is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


 

Practice Area Resource Centers
Visit our Practice Area Resource Centers to view practice area specific content compiled from a variety of legal sources. Find related articles, podcasts, industry leader insights and much more. We currently offer the following Practice Areas: Litigation; Intellectual Property; Real Estate; Corporate Law; Criminal Law; Bankruptcy; Immigration; Business Law; Insurance; Taxation; Labor & Employment; Commercial Law; Medical Malpractice; Trusts & Estates; Securities; International Law ; Health Care; Environmental Law; Construction Law; Workers' Compensation





Total Practice Solutions

 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.