Mr. Thomas L. Grisham, Esq

TG
  • Member at Grisham & Lawless, P.A.
  • Albuquerque, NM 87102-3176
  • Peer Reviews
    4.4/5.0
    Client Reviews
    < 50% Recommended (1)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update your Profile

Areas of Practice (16)

  • Litigation
  • Probate
  • Real Estate
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Appeals
  • Business
  • Corporations
  • Estate Planning
  • Taxation
  • Wills
  • General
  • Personal Injury
  • Torts
  • Prop Damage
  • Trial Practice
  • Property Damage

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of New Mexico, B.A., 1969
Law School Attended:
University of New Mexico, J.D., 1973
Year of First Admission:
1973
Admission:
1973, New Mexico and U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico; 2003, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; 1976, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit; 1978, U.S. Supreme Court
ISLN:
906858071

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 1.3/5.0 (1 review)
  • Communication

    2.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    1.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    1.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    1.0/5.0
  • No Recommendations   1.3/5.0 Rated on 01/28/13 in Business Law.

    Was not responsive to our inputs. Would take our inputs as if he were going to use them on drafts of motions etc, then would go off and "edit", bill us for multiple hours and when we received the updated documents, there would very few, if... Read more

    Read more

    Was not responsive to our inputs. Would take our inputs as if he were going to use them on drafts of motions etc, then would go off and "edit", bill us for multiple hours and when we received the updated documents, there would very few, if any updates. His office technology is still in the 1980's programs. They almost missed several deadlines with the the court, claiming the new court system's technology changes were messing things up, when our opposing attorney had no issues. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer