• Scrutiny of Reverse Payment Settlements
  • March 24, 2014 | Authors: Sarah Hasford; Richard A. Ripley
  • Law Firm: Haynes Boone LLP - Dallas Office
  • It has been less than a year since the Supreme Court handed down its decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013) (hereinafter “Actavis”) and differences in how district courts are interpreting that decision already suggest that the Court may once again need to address the issue of antitrust scrutiny of Hatch-Waxman-related patent settlements in the not too distant future.