Michael T. Sansbury

Michael T. Sansbury: Attorney with Spotswood Sansom & Sansbury LLC

Biography

Phi Beta Kappa; Pi Sigma Alpha. Senior Editor, Yale Law and Policy Review. John M. Olin Fellow. Law Clerk, Hon. Emmett R. Cox, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, 2001-2002.

Areas of Practice (3)

  • Class Actions
  • Complex Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate Practice

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
205-986-3623  Phone
205-986-3639  Fax
www.spotswoodllc.com
University Attended:
University of the South, B.A., Economics and Political Science, magna cum laude, with honors, 1998
Law School Attended:
Yale Law School, J.D., 2001
Year of First admission:
2001
Admission:
2001, Georgia; 2002, Alabama; U.S. District Courts, Northern and Middle Districts of Alabama; U.S. Courts of Appeals, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits; 2003, U.S. District Courts, Southern District of Alabama and Middle District of Georgia; 2005, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Courts of Appeals, First and Sixth Circuits
Memberships:
Birmingham, Federal (Member, Federal Litigation and Transportation Law Sections; Treasurer, Birmingham Chapter) and American (Member, Litigation Section) Bar Associations; State Bar of Georgia; Alabama State Bar.
Birth Information:
Atlanta, Georgia, April 27, 1976
Reported Cases:
Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. Warren, 2008 WL 630469 (M.D. Ala. 2008); Williams v. Select Media Services, LLC, 2008 WL 544914 (M.D. Ala. 2008); Holland v. MGA, Inc., 221 Fed.Appx. 911 (C.A.11 (Ala.) 2007); Whitaker v. MGA, Inc., 220 Fed.Appx. 929 (C.A.11 (Ga.) 2007); Yessayan v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 2007 WL 5162454 (C.D. Cal. 2007); Clark v. MGA, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 723, 2006 WL 3422345 (11th Cir. 2006); Hicks v. Airborne Express, Inc., 367 Ill.App.3d 1005, 858 N.E.2d 48, 306 Ill.Dec. 603 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 2006); Ex parte Haynes Downard Andra & Jones, LLP, 924 So. 2d 687 (Ala. 2005); On the House Syndication, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp., 79 Fed. Appx. 247, 2003 WL 22071278 (9th Cir. (Cal.) 2003); Hope For Families & Community Service, Inc. v. Warren, 721 F.Supp.2d 1079 (M.D. Ala. 2010); Wieber v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 231 Or. App. 469, 220 P.3d 68 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
ISLN:
916761934

Peer Reviews

  • 4.6/5.0 (23 reviews)
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.7/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.7/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.6/5.0
  • Communication

    4.5/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.3/5.0

See All 23 Reviews »


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0 (1 review)
  • 100% (1 recommendation)
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    5.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    5.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    5.0/5.0
  • Recommended 5.0/5.0 Rated on 06/28/12 in Insurance.

    Michael had a good grasp of the issue and was able to assist Bob when needed in the depositions as well as the response that was needed regarding the suit.

    Michael had a good grasp of the issue and was able to assist Bob when needed in the depositions as well as the response that was needed regarding the suit. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Other documents: ,

Birmingham, Alabama

Contact Michael T. Sansbury

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.


You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.