- 5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
•Appointed by the Alabama Supreme Court in 2015 to serve a third term as a member of the Standing Committee on Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure until October 2018
•Recognized as a leading Appellate practitioner in the Eleventh Circuit Benchmark: Appellate
•Listed in Best Lawyers in Americafor Appellate Law
•AV Peer Rating by Martindale Hubbell
•Listed in Mid-South Super Lawyers magazine as one of the top attorneys in the state of Alabama
•Member of The American Society of Legal Advocates, which selects less than 1.5% of lawyers nationwide for membership
•Obtained a favorable opinion from the Supreme Court of Alabama reversing and remanding a trial court’s denial of a client’s request to compel arbitration of claims filed against his business in Baldwin County, Alabama.
•In June 2015, Sybil Newton, along with Jay Ezelle and Randy Sellers, obtained favorable ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court on behalf of a university provost in a suit involving an on-campus shooting of six faculty members. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed all of the decisions of the trial court and rejected plaintiffs’ request for a rehearing.
•In February of 2015, Sybil Newton, along with Gray Stiff, and Scott Stevens, obtained a favorable ruling from the 11th Circuit in a holding which affirmed the District Court’s (Southern District of Alabama) grant of summary judgment to insurance carrier in a case brought by an Alabama bank seeking payment under a financial institution bond. The bank alleged breach of contract and bad faith and sought over 1,000,000 from the carrier after a customer of the Bank defaulted on loans secured, in part, by a stock certificate which he had obtained fraudulently. The primary issue on appeal was whether the fraudulently obtained stock certificate met the definition of a “counterfeit” under the terms of the bond. The trial court held, and the 11th Circuit agreed, that the stock certificate at issue was an authentic document, even if procured under false pretenses, and does not meet the definition of “counterfeit” or trigger coverage under the bond. The Bank’s application for rehearing en banc was denied by the 11th Circuit on April 20, 2015. The opinion issued by the 11th Circuit was the subject of several articles in Appellate Law 360.
•In August of 2014, obtained favorable ruling from the 11th Circuit Court in favor of a national grocery store chain, affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment in this premises liability/slip and fall case. Warren Butler and Scott Stevens successfully obtained summary judgment for our Defendant, and Sybil Newton handled the briefing before the 11th Circuit following the Plaintiff’s appeal. The case contains helpful language regarding the Plaintiff’s burden on causation, the need for expert testimony on issues outside of a layperson’s understanding, and the impropriety of basing a theory upon speculation.
•In August of 2014, obtained ruling from The Alabama Supreme Court overruling Boudreaux v. Pettaway, 108 So.3d 486 (Ala. 2012), and expressly rejecting the prior holding in Boudreaux that a potential bad faith claim against a defendant physician ’s insurer should be considered as a present asset in determining whether a judgment should be remitted.
•In July of 2014, Obtained favorable ruling for a Defendant/coal mining company from the Alabama Supreme Court in a case which arose from a claim for benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the case and held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider this issue outside of the federal framework for BLBA actions.
News & Insights
Twenty-Seven SDF Attorneys Listed in Best Lawyers in America 2019
•Twenty-Eight SDF Attorneys Named to the 2017 Edition of Mid-South Super Lawyers
•Newton Butler and Presley Obtain Favorable Ruling from The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
•Twenty-Six SDF Lawyers Listed in the 2018 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
•SDF Attorneys Obtain Favorable Opinion From Supreme Court of Alabama
•Twenty-Six SDF Attorneys Named to the 2016 Edition of Mid-South Super Lawyers
•Sybil Newton Appointed to Serve a Third Term on the Standing Committee on Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure
•Starnes Davis Florie Wins Alabama Supreme Court Decision in Professor Shooting Suit
•Twenty-Six SDF Attorneys Named to 2015 Alabama Super Lawyers
•Stiff, Newton & Stevens Obtain a Favorable Appellate Ruling in Financial Institution Bond Case
•Starnes Davis Florie Granted Favorable Ruling by The Alabama Supreme Court
•Thirty SDF Attorneys Named to Alabama Super Lawyers 2014
•Twenty-Six Starnes Davis Florie Attorneys Listed in Alabama Super Lawyers 2013
•Starnes Davis Florie Lawyers Secure Appellate Reversal & Rendering of Adverse Malpractice Verdict
•Starnes Attorney Sybil Newton Appointed to Serve a Second Term as a Member of the Standing Committee on Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure
•Starnes Davis Florie Highly Ranked in 2013 Benchmark Litigation & Benchmark Appellate
•Twenty-Two Starnes Attorneys Listed in Alabama Super Lawyers
•SDF’s Appellate Group Recognized in Benchmark: Appellate
Sybil is the mother of five children. Her eldest, Adair is married and resides in Mobile, Alabama with her husband. Her second, Richard, is an architect in Atlanta, Georgia. Her twin boys, Ross and William are students at Auburn University. Her son Lucas is a student at Altamont high school.
•Sybil is a volunteer for CASA (court appointed special advocate for children). As a CASA volunteer, Sybil was appointed by a judge to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court and other settings.
•Sybil is a member of the Cathedral Church of the Advent, which she attends with her husband and their five children.
•She has served as a volunteer in the children's Christian Education Program at the Church of the Advent and as a United Way Allocation Team Member.
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.