• Insurer’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Was Denied Because Its Refusal to Accept a Policy Limits Settlement Demand was not Objectively Reasonable
  • May 22, 2017 | Author: David M. Plouff
  • Law Firm: Morris Polich & Purdy LLP - San Diego Office
  • A Nevada federal district court denied an insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, holding that a refusal to accept a policy limits settlement demand on a claim that was likely to exceed the policy’s limits and included a full release of all claims was not objectively reasonable.