Michael Doerksen

Michael Doerksen: Attorney with Field Law
  • Associate at Field Law (122 Attorneys)
  • 400 - 444 7 AVE SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 0X8
    View Michael Doerksen's office location
  • Peer Reviews
    No Reviews
    Client Reviews
    No Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]


Michael Doerksen is an experienced research lawyer who helps clients requiring complex legal analysis. His practice has a particular focus on insurance coverage issues including automobile liability, municipal and general liability, director and officer liability, professional errors and omissions coverage, casualty coverage and cargo and transportation coverage. His experience includes a wide variety of commercial disputes ranging from property development issues to construction disputes and contract interpretation.

He has prepared written submissions in cases before the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Alberta Court of Appeal, the British Columbia Supreme Court and various administrative tribunals in Alberta.

As Field Law’s research lawyer, Michael’s clients and colleagues look to him to thoroughly analyze legal issues and make the analysis accessible. Describing himself as having an academic disposition , his aptitude for research and writing makes him the go-to person when clients need a comprehensive and knowledgeable legal opinion or a well-crafted written submission for a court, arbitration panel or tribunal. With more than 15 years of experience, Michael offers his clients the proficiency needed to write effective submissions that have received excellent feedback from the courts. Michael’s clients appreciate that his legal opinions consistently provide a candid and forthright assessment of the pros and cons of the client’s legal position.

Value to Clients

In most litigation you can’t tell the client with 100 per cent conviction where the dispute will end up. But what I can do is to dig deep into an issue and offer some concrete recommendations clients can be confident in. One of Michael’s clients says of his insurance coverage advice: You are full of wonderful information that makes my work seamless.

Outside the Office

I have two teenaged sons who keep me busy. Michael says. His love of the fiddle also keeps him busy. I started playing when I was young. When I came to Field Law I found other musicians here and I became part of the firm band.


Keyland Development Corporation v Rocky View (Municipal District No 44), 2016 ABQB 735, Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench

News + Views + Events

June 2018
Municipal Minute: Case Comment on McAllister v. Calgary
August 2013
Advanced Payments by Automobile Insurers
July 2013
Advanced Payments by Automobile Insurers
April 2013
Saskatchewan Trial Court Awards Record Punitive Damages for Insurer Bad Faith
July 2012
If a Tree Falls in Quebec, Can Anybody Sue?
March 2010
Fundamental Breach R.I.P. Freedom of Contract Gains Traction in Supreme Court’s Decision in Tercon
December 2009
Finding the Killer Case
November 2009
Finding the Killer Case
Co-Author: Karen McDougall
October 2008
Protecting Pre-Trial Privacy
September 2008
The Problem of the Late Suing Plaintiff
April 2008
Compellability of Witnesses in Arbitration
April 2008
Implications Arising from Parallel or Related Proceedings - Use of Evidence - Res Judicata - Having Proceedings Stayed
April 2008
Compellability of Witnesses in Arbitration
Winter 2008
Pre-Trail Privacy
Bill 11, Insurance Amendment Act 2008
Prepare Now to Avoid the Pitfalls of E-Discovery Later
May 2006
Party On? Supreme Court of Canada Rules on Liability of Social Hosts for Guests’ Drunk Driving
March 2006
Goodbye Statutory Condition 14: Limitations Act Amendment Places in Doubt the One Year Limitation in All-Risk Property Policies
November 2005
Court Rejects Challenge to Alberta’s Insurance Reform
November 2005
Consent to Operate a Motor Vehicle -Liability and Coverage
November 2005
Questionable Coverage - Non-Waivers and Reservations of Rights
October 2005
To Belt or not to Belt: New Limits on Contributory Negligence
April 2005
Twenty-First Century Damage:Non-Pecuniary Damages Awards in Cases of Catastrphic Injuries - Western Provinces and Ontario Since 2000 to March 2005
Privilege and Rule 26(2.1) of the B.C. Rules of Court
The Principled Approach to Hearsay in Civil Procedure since R. v. Khan
Implications Arising from Parallel or Related Proceedings-Use of Evidance-Res Judicata-Having Proceedings Stayed

Client Stories

Helping clients with plain language policy writing

•The firm’s client occupies a specialized market in property and liability insurance in Alberta. The client was in the process developing a new wording for its property and business interruption insurance. The client came to Michael for legal support because of his familiarity with the client’s existing policy wording, experience in providing coverage analysis involving that wording and familiarity with the client’s specialized market. The client’s objective was a clear, rational and intuitive policy wording. Michael worked with the client’s primary drafter to develop a new policy wording that addressed the client’s insuring objectives in clear and accessible language and met the requirements of Alberta insurance law. The client remarks: I am pleased with Michael’s consultative approach to our project. We were able to address policy wording challenges in an effective manner because of the open dialogue followed by his research and presentation of realistic and actionable options to each issue I raised.

Using legal research to identify opportunities

•The firm acted for an Alberta municipality and its liability insurer in a factually complex lawsuit brought by a real estate developer against the municipality. The lawsuit arose from a residential real estate development. Working with one of Field’s leading insurance litigation partners, Michael’s legal research helped identify an opportunity to shorten the lawsuit by pursuing summary judgment on specific issues. Michael took the lead in preparing court materials supporting a summary judgment application, including affidavits and written arguments on behalf of the client. Following a three-day hearing in 2016 a Queen’s Bench Justice’s decision (reported at 2016 ABQB 735) dismissed all claims, sparing the clients the expense and inconvenience of a lengthy trial.

Areas of Practice (1)

  • Insurance

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
403 232 1752  Phone
403 264 7084  Fax
University Attended:
Concordia University, Montreal, Bachelor of Arts, 1993; University of Toronto, Master of Arts, 1995
Law School Attended:
University of British Columbia, Bachelor of Laws, 1998
Year of First admission:
2000, Alberta


Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)
Law Society of Alberta
Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)
Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)
Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)
Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)
Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Research Law Section (South)


Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This attorney does not have client reviews.

Documents (2)

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Calgary, Alberta

Contact Michael Doerksen

Required Fields

Required Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.