- ITC Decides Not To Review Enforcement Initial Determination in Certain R-134a Coolant (337-TA-623)
- December 2, 2009 | Author: Eric W. Schweibenz
- Law Firm: Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. - Alexandria Office
On November 23, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice determining not to review Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern’s September 21, 2009 Enforcement Initial Determination (“EID”) in Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise Known as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane) (Inv. No. 337-TA-623).
By way of background, INEOS Fluor Holdings Ltd., INEOS Fluor Ltd. and INEOS Fluor Americas LLC (collectively, “INEOS”) filed a complaint in December 2007 alleging violations of Section 337 by several respondents including Sinochem Environmental Protection Chemicals (Taicang) Co., Ltd. (“Sinochem”) in the importation into the U.S., the sale for importation, and the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain R-134a coolant (otherwise known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane) by reason of infringement of certain patents, including U.S. Patent No. 5,559,276. See our April 6 post for more details. On August 15, 2008, the Sinochem respondents moved for partial termination of the investigation based on the entry of a consent order specific to their “old” process for manufacture of R-134a coolant. On August 20, 2008, the ALJ issued an initial determination (“ID”) granting the motion and terminating the investigation with respect to the “old” process. The Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s ID and issued a Consent Order on September 11, 2008. On December 12, 2008, INEOS filed a complaint, requesting that the Commission institute a formal enforcement proceeding to investigate an alleged violation of the Consent Order relating to the “old” process. On February 18, 2009, the Commission issued a notice instituting a formal enforcement proceeding. On September 21, 2009, ALJ Luckern issued the EID determining that Sinochem did not violate the Consent Order issued by the Commission on September 11, 2008. See our October 9 post for more details.
According to the November 23 notice, the “Commission has determined not to review the EID.”