Regulatory colleges and associations look to Leah for practical advice on issues around continuing compliance, registration and discipline, and in defending lawsuits brought against them. In her labour and employment practice, she helps employees and employers deal with matters that include terminations and severance, human rights issues, performance concerns, labour relations, corporate policy and contract disputes. In her civil litigation practice, Leah offers strategic counsel around a wide variety of civil disputes.
She has appeared before the Alberta Court of Appeal, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, the Provincial Court of Alberta, the Federal Court of Canada and several administrative tribunals. She clerked for the Alberta Court of Appeal before joining Field Law. Upon graduating from the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in 2013, Leah was awarded the Horace Harvey Gold Medal in Law and the Alberta Premier’s Medal, for achieving the highest academic standing in both the Faculty of Law and all professional faculties at the University.
Leah has a strong intellectual curiosity that serves her clients well. It allows her to approach each issue analytically. Leah believes it is her job to ensure clients understand the current and future implications of any issue and to present a practical and thoughtful solution.
Clients appreciate Leah’s generalist perspective as her experience in various practice areas allows her to see each issue from a comprehensive viewpoint and address emerging issues effectively.
Value to Clients
Previous experience in project management and corporate communications has taught Leah the importance of strong communications and advocacy skills. This has translated well for her as a lawyer when dealing with her clients, the courts and opposing counsel. I’m able to know the value of putting myself into their shoes, understanding their perspectives and communicating our side effectively.
Outside the Office
When she’s not working, Leah enjoys family time and the outdoors - especially hiking and biking in Edmonton’s river valley.
May v 1986855 Alberta Ltd, 2018 ABCA 94
Ladouceur v. Metis Settlement Appeal Tribunal, 2018 ABCA 237
Blackbird v. Maskwacis Health Services, 2018 FC 239
M.K. Engineering Inc. v. Plecash, 2015 ABCA 311, Alberta Court of Appeal
Mueller v. Oko, 2015 ABCA 194, Alberta Court of Appeal
Alberta Premier’s Silver Medal
Horace Harvey Gold Medal in Law
News + Views + Events
Duty of Fairness at Investigative Stage and the Importance of Cooperation in an Investigation
Perspectives for the Professions / Canadian Employment Law Today
Update on Conflicts of Interest Act: Deadlines Looming for Post-Secondary Institutions
Termination Problems: When Can You Walk Away From a Contract?
Field Law Blog
Bill 27: Expansion of the Conflicts of Interest Act to Public Agencies
Province Announces New Partnership with Police to Investigate Serious Workplace Safety Incidents
Significant Consequences Mean Significant Procedural Rights: Alberta Court of Appeal Provides Guidance on Procedural Fairness in Incapacity Assessments
Professional Regulatory Alert
January - March 2016
Labour and Employment: 2015 Year in Review
Case Summary: Expired Appeals
Case Summary: Standard of Review in Discipline Matter
October 2015 Brings Key Upcoming Employer Obligations: Minimum Wage Increases and Federal Election Responsibilities
Clarifying the Legal Test for Family Status Discrimination: Federal Court of Appeal Rules Employers Discriminated by Failing to Accommodate Employees’ Childcare Needs
Successful research analysis for elected official
Leah’s client was elected to a provincial body, but his election was challenged by an opponent. Another lawyer (a sole practitioner) successfully defended the challenge in the Court of Queen’s Bench but when the opponent appealed it, the sole practitioner referred the matter to Field Law to handle. The client then turned to Leah and her colleague to defend the appeal.
Leah and her colleague did extensive research and analysis around a somewhat novel case and effectively argued that the election challenge was without merit. Leah and her colleague’s arguments were accepted by the Court of Appeal, who ruled in favour of the client. The client was pleased to end a long-standing challenge and get back to focusing on his role as an elected official.
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.