Edmonton, AB:

Pringle Chivers Sparks Teskey

Pringle Chivers Sparks Teskey
  • Edmonton, AB
  • Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 0P6
  • We are hard working criminal lawyers dedicated to a practical, client-centered approach to your problems with the law.
  • Peer Reviews
    No Reviews
    Client Reviews
    < 50% Recommended (1)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update this Profile

Office Details

Office Size:
6
Languages:
English.

Areas of Practice (24)

Specific Areas of Practice for our Edmonton office:

  • Criminal Law
  • Murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Drug Offences
  • Sex Crimes
  • Assault
  • Theft
  • Weapons and Firearms Offences
  • White Collar Crime
  • Income Tax Evasion
  • Fraud and Commercial Crime
  • Impaired Driving Offences
  • Young Offender Cases
  • Extradition
  • Regulatory Offences
  • Occupational Health and Safety Offences
  • Dangerous Goods Offences
  • Environmental Offences
  • Fish and Wildlife Offences
  • Competition Act Offences
  • Immigration Offences
  • Embezzlement
  • White Collar Criminal Defense
  • White Collar Fraud

Peer Reviews

This firm’s lawyers do not have peer reviews.

*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 1.0/5.0 (1 review)
  • Communication

    1.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    1.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    1.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    1.0/5.0
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Review for Michael Sparks on 10/30/17 in Criminal Law.

    This is my opinion. My case was pretty straight forward. All Sparks had to do was pay attention and question her about her statements to the police, get the pictures thrown out, and question her about things she said in the Preliminary hearing. He di... Read more

    Read more

    This is my opinion. My case was pretty straight forward. All Sparks had to do was pay attention and question her about her statements to the police, get the pictures thrown out, and question her about things she said in the Preliminary hearing. He didn't do this. I don't know what he was working on during the trial, but it wasn't my trial. He was working on something else and distracted the whole time. He used none of the evidence in my case. Don't use him. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer