• A Refresher On Coaching Vacancies: Who Gets The Position?
  • October 10, 2011
  • Law Firm: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP - Morgantown Office
  • A common issue always arising among West Virginia county boards of education relates to the filling of coaching positions in public schools. For example, does a citizen (non-employee) receive a coaching position over a currently certified professional educator? Does a certified professional educator receive a coaching position over a substitute employee holding certification? Does a certified professional educator in the home county receive priority over a certified professional educator employed in an adjoining county? What is the impact of an employee who is on permit? Does a service personnel employee have any rights to be a coach?

    The purpose of this month's education law newsletter is to provide a yearly refresher to county boards of education as it relates to these common issues when dealing with coaching vacancies.

    • A certified professional educator generally has priority in coaching vacancies. However, a substitute who is certified is equal to a certified regular employed professional educator. As such, a board of education does not violate W. Va. Code 18A-3-2a when it hires a substitute teacher over a regularly employed teacher to fill a coaching position. Halley v. Boone County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 00-03-329 (Apr. 4, 2001).

    • An employee possessing a teaching permit cannot receive a coaching position over a currently employed certified professional educator who has applied for the position or a certified substitute who has applied for the position. Arrington v. Jackson County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 04-18-365 (Apr. 29, 2005).

    • W. Va. Code 18A-3-2a does not provide that the currently employed professional educator has to be an employee of the county in which the job is posted in order to have hiring priority. However, the out-of-county teacher must be able to meet the scheduling demands of the coaching position in order to be hired for it. State Superintendent Interpretation, June 3, 2003.

    • W. Va. Code 18A-3-2a(4) states, in part: " . . . the state superintendent may issue certificates for persons to serve in the public schools as athletic coaches or other extracurricular activities coaches . . . subject to the following limitations: . . . (B) a currently employed certified professional educator has not applied for the position . . .". As such, coaching certificates may be issued to individuals who are not otherwise employed by a county board of education, but only when a currently employed certified professional educator has not applied for the extracurricular position. But, “coaching positions held by individuals [i.e, citizen coaches or temporary teaching permit] who are not currently employed certified professional educators should be posted every year.” State Superintendent Interpretation, June 3, 2003;Shockey v. Preston County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 04-39-045 (July 26, 2004); Wright v. McDowell County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 07-33-318 (Nov. 16, 2007).

    • Service personnel employees are eligible to receive coaching authorizations. However, they can only receive the authorization when s/he has been offered employment as a coach and no currently employed professional educator has applied for the position. The service employee must also meet all requirements of West Virginia Board of Education Policy 5202. State Superintendent Interpretation, June 27, 2007.

    • Service personnel employees who hold teaching certificates do not need to hold coaching authorizations in order to be employed as coaches in West Virginia public schools. However, pursuant to W. Va. Code 18A-3-2a, those currently employed professional educators who are fully certified will receive hiring preference over those individuals who possess permits (e.g., sub permits). In other words, the fully certified teacher will always receive preference over individuals possessing only lesser certificates. Arrington v. Jackson County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 04-18-365 (Apr. 29, 2005).

    • The standard of review for filling coaching positions is to assess whether the Board abused its broad discretion in the selection or acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner. Chaffin v. Wayne County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 92-50-398 (July 27, 1993); Hedinger v. Wyoming County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 2010-0598-WYOED (March 4, 2011).