Attorney Profile:

Natalie Carol Scott

NS

Areas of Practice (6)

  • Bankruptcy and Bankruptcy Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor's Rights
  • Workouts
  • Collections

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Arizona State University, B.A., 1998
Law School Attended:
University of Oregon, J.D., 2002
Year of First admission:
2002
Admission:
2002, Oregon
ISLN:
918998888

Peer Reviews

  • 4.6/5.0 16 reviews
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.7/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.7/5.0
  • Communication

    4.4/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.3/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 04/01/13 in Commercial Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 04/01/13 in Appellate Practice

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 04/01/13 in Bankruptcy

    Ms. Scott is a brilliant writer and can make any complex issue understandable. Read more

    Ms. Scott is a brilliant writer and can make any complex issue understandable.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 03/22/13 in Bankruptcy

    Natalie is very bright, has great analytical skills and is a great writer. She is also responsive and attentive. Read more

    Natalie is very bright, has great analytical skills and is a great writer. She is also responsive and attentive.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Partner on 04/04/13 in Bankruptcy

    Very bright and intelligent. Gives practical advice and is tough, yet professional. Read more

    Very bright and intelligent. Gives practical advice and is tough, yet professional.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Of Counsel on 03/27/13 in Bankruptcy

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Associate on 03/20/13 in Commercial Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Associate on 03/20/13 in Bankruptcy

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Partner on 03/19/10 in Bankruptcy

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.6/5.0 by a Private Practice Lawyer on 03/25/13 in Bankruptcy Chapter 11

    Mrs. Scott has excellent analytic ability and legal skill. Read more

    Mrs. Scott has excellent analytic ability and legal skill.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

See All 16 Reviews See All 16 Reviews »


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

Disclaimer

Featured Law Firms