Specific Areas of Practice for our Fayetteville office:
Nursing Home Litigation
Federal Civil Practice
Commercial Real Estate Contract
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Casualty Insurance Defense
Commercial Insurance Defense
Automobile Accidents and Injuries
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Commercial Vehicle Liability
Electromagnetic Field Litigation
Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
Personal Injury Appeals
Personal Injury Arbitration
Personal Injury Defense
Personal Injury Mediation
Plaintiffs Personal Injury
Power Line Contact Injury
Rental Vehicle Litigation
Repetitive Stress Injury
School Bus Accidents
Slip and Fall
Third Party Wrongful Death
Transfusion Associated AIDS
All Terrain Vehicle Products Liability
Automotive Design Liability
Automotive Products Liability
Automotive Warranty Law
Bicycle Products Liability
Biomedical Products Liability
Blood Bank Liability
Breach of Warranty
Breast Implant Litigation
Chemical Products Liability
Dalkon Shield Litigation
Diet Drug Litigation
Drug and Medical Device Defense
Drug and Medical Device Litigation
Engineering Products Liability
Environmental Products Liability
Food Borne Disease
Food Products Liability
Heart Device Litigation
Heavy Equipment Products Liability
Industrial Products Liability
Motorcycle Products Liability
Office Equipment Products Liability
Product Warning Labels
Products Liability Arbitration
Products Liability Defense
Products Liability Insurance Coverage
Products Liability Mediation
Products Liability Subrogation
Propane Products Liability
Recreational Products Liability
Recreational Vehicle Products Liability
Seat Belt Injury
Tire Defect Litigation
Welding Products Liability
Homeowners Association Law
Real Estate Acquisitions
Real Estate Litigation
Real Estate Sales
Contested Trusts and Estates
Missing Heir Searches
About Peer Rating
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell's extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.
About Client Rating
The Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by clients of lawyers and law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending and who want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that the reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified within the past year, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses are entirely from client reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review.
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Testimonials or endorsements in any review do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Past results are not a guarantee of any future results as each case must be decided on its own merits. Client Review Ratings and/or Peer Review Ratings may not be available for all firms and/or lawyers and the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable.