Jay A. Christofferson

Jay A. Christofferson: Attorney with Wanger Jones Helsley PC AV stamp icon
Attorney Awards

Biography

Mr. Christofferson is a shareholder of WJH. Mr. Christofferson practices in all areas of business litigation, including cases involving breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, business dissolution, joint venture, subrogation, personal injury and insurance coverage disputes. He has litigated a half a dozen court trials and arbitrations throughout the San Joaquin Valley, Los Angeles and San Diego and has successfully argued before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and the Third District Court of Appeal.

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Insurance Coverage
  • Bad Faith
  • Subrogation
  • Civil Litigation

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
559-233-4800  Phone
559-233-9330  Fax
www.wjhattorneys.com
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 28340, Fresno, CA 93720-1553
University Attended:
University of Utah, M.S., 1995
Law School Attended:
McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, J.D., with great distinction, 1999
Year of First Admission:
1999
Admission:
California
Memberships:
State Bar of California; Fresno County Young Lawyers (Board Member, 2003-2005).
Reported Cases:
Published Decisions - Insurance and Bad Faith, California Court of Appeal: American International Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Continental Casualty Ins. Co. (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1342 (settling insurers did not have a claim for equitable contribution based on a failure to notify the objecting insurer of its potential liability for contribution prior to a settlement.); F & H Construction v. ITT Hartford Ins. Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 364 (a contractor could not recover the cost of modifying inadequate steel pile caps as property damage was not established by the mere failure of a defective product to perform as intended.); St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. Frontier Pacific Ins. Co. (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 1234 (although a lessee had been dismissed from an action arising from an underlying tort claim, an insurer's action for contribution from other carriers was remanded for determination of the lessee's liability as necessary to allocate the contributions between the insurers.). Published Decisions - Insurance and Bad Faith, U.S. District Court - California: GBTI, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, 46917 (E.D. Cal. 2011) (granting insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment that a claim for piercing of the corporate veil does not create the requisite "vicarious liability' to establish coverage for shareholders, directors, or officers as "anyone liable' for the conduct of an insured under an omnibus provision in a commercial auto policy); GBTI, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (E.D. Cal. 2009) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70368 (Dismissal of claim for punitive damages against insurer.); New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Mendocino Forest Products, Co., LLC (N.D. Cal. 2007) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76147 (negligence of an indemnitor is not required to establish the application of a general indemnity agreement); Valley Air Conditioning & Repair, Inc. v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. (E.D. Cal. 2007) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70111 (successful 12b(6) motion to eliminate claims for breach of fiduciary duty, intentional interference with a protected property interest and violation of Insurance Code ยง 790.03). Published Decisions - Insurance and Bad Faith, U.S. District Court - Oregon: Am. Int'l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28212 (D. Or. 2011) (a failure to procure insurance by the insured precludes an insurer's subrogation action as it constitutes a complete defense to a claim by an insurer); American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company v. KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc., (D. Or. 2010) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78374 (granting AISLIC's motion for summary judgment in establishing that KinderCare did not qualify as an additional insured as the loss did not arise out of AISLIC's named insured's ongoing operations). Published Decisions - Non-Insurance, California Supreme Court: Utilities Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water District (2001) 26 Cal.App.4th 1185 (the 120 day statute of limitations applied to an action by a public agency to recover amounts paid to a public utility for capital improvements barred plaintiff's action.). Published Decisions - Non-Insurance, U.S. District Court - Oregon: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company v. KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc. (D. Or. 2008) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48635 (finding an indemnity agreement conspicuous and applicable based on its incorporation into the final contract between the toy supplier and KinderCare). Published Decisions - Non-Insurance, U.S. Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit: American International Specialty Lines, Ins. Co. v. Kindercare Learning Ctrs., Inc. (9th Cir. 2010) U.S. App. LEXIS 2611 (Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court in finding that an indemnity agreement was inconspicuous pursuant to the Oregon version of the UCC).
ISLN:
914486969
Payment Information:
  • Fixed Hourly Rates

Peer Reviews

Fresno, California

Contact Jay A. Christofferson

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.