Thomas P. Gmelich

Thomas P. Gmelich: Attorney with Bradley & Gmelich LLP AV stamp icon
Attorney Awards


Thomas P. Gmelich is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley in 1989, where he attained Dean's List Honors. He obtained his juris doctorate at Loyola Law School in 1993. While in law school and upon graduation, he worked as a clerk and attorney at a prestigious Los Angeles plaintiff's firm handling all aspects of personal injury litigation, including toxic torts and chemical exposure. Prior to starting the firm, Mr. Gmelich practiced at a civil defense firm, focusing on general civil liability litigation, personal/commercial auto, private security guard litigation, recreational sports injury litigation, insurance fraud litigation, complex business litigation, construction defect and maritime and cargo loss. He has successfully defended claims against a wide variety of clients, including fitness clubs, all construction trades, product manufacturers, private security companies, and transportation companies, including ocean, rail and air carriers.

Mr. Gmelich has extensive experience in litigating insurance fraud claims and has successfully litigated "whistleblower" actions under California's Insurance Code Section 1871.7 on behalf of various insurance carriers.

Mr. Gmelich is a member of the International Health, Racquet & Sports Club Association (IHRSA) and its regional affiliate, California Clubs of Distinction (CCD). He has lectured extensively to health clubs throughout California on liability and employment issues facing the sports and recreation industry. He is a regular legal columnist for IHRSA's Club Business International magazine, the American College of Sports Medicine's Health & Fitness Journal, and California Clubs of Distinction's quarterly publication. He is also the editor and primary author of the firm's newsletter, the Sports & Recreation Legal Update, a publication that aims to educate the recreation industry on legal issues, ranging from recent case law and legislation to practical loss prevention tips.

Mr. Gmelich is also an active member of the American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS), the Retail Special Agents Association (RSAA) and the International Association for Healthcare Security & Safety (IAHSS). He has contributed articles for IAHSS's quarterly publication and RSAA's newsletter, focusing on recent case law affecting the private security industry. He is also editor of the firm's quarterly newsletter, the Premises Liability & Private Security Legal Update, which educates and advises landowners and security companies on the current legal issues in California affecting their businesses. He obtained a successful published Federal Appellate Court opinion, which provides significant liability protection for airport security companies relating to property loss claims. In Ester Dazo vs. Globe Airport Security Services, Inc., et al (2001 DJDAR 10859), the 9th Circuit upheld the liability limitation provisions of the Warsaw Convention in favor of airport security companies for property losses sustained by plaintiffs engaged in international travel.

Areas of Practice (16)

  • Railroad Litigation Defense
  • Retail Store Defense
  • Personal/Commercial Auto Defense
  • Private Security Companies
  • Security Guard Litigation
  • Recreational Sports Injury Litigation
  • Health and Fitness Clubs
  • Construction Defect Litigation
  • General Civil Litigation
  • Complex Business Litigation
  • Construction Defect & Trades
  • Breach of Contract
  • Insurance Fraud Litigation
  • Maritime and Cargo Loss
  • Transportation Companies
  • Product Liability

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
818-237-9261  Phone
818-243-5200  Phone
818-243-5266  Fax
University Attended:
University of California, Berkeley, B.A., 1989
Law School Attended:
Loyola Law School, J.D., 1993
Year of First Admission:
2000, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1995, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1993, California
Los Angeles County Bar Association; Association of Southern California Defense Counsel; American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS); Retail Special Agents Association (RSAA); International Association for Healthcare Security and Safety (IAHSS).

Reported Cases:
Dazo v. Globe Airport Security Services, 295 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2002).

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (15 reviews)
High ethical standing icon
A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

  • Analytical Capability

  • Judgment

  • Communication

  • Legal Experience

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Judge on 07/25/13 in Civil Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Judge on 07/16/13 in Civil Litigation

    Mr. Gmelich is a highly experienced litigator who consistently exhibits the highest standards of competence and professionalism. His courtroom demeanor is beyond reproach, demonstrating a sense of collegiality and respect to his opponents. Mr. Gmel... Read more

    Read more

    Mr. Gmelich is a highly experienced litigator who consistently exhibits the highest standards of competence and professionalism. His courtroom demeanor is beyond reproach, demonstrating a sense of collegiality and respect to his opponents. Mr. Gmelich possesses those qualities and skills which distinguish him as a superior attorney. Read less

    Read less

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.



Glendale, California

Contact Thomas P. Gmelich

Required Fields

Required Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.